Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2017, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 505-512.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-017-0556-9
Special Issue: 2016-2017镁合金虚拟专辑
• Orginal Article • Next Articles
Yu-Zhen Zhao1, Xiao-Teng Liu1, Hai Hao1
Received:2017-03-14
Revised:2017-03-14
Online:2017-06-30
Published:2017-08-25
Yu-Zhen Zhao, Xiao-Teng Liu, Hai Hao. Effect of Al4C3 Particle Size Distribution in a Al-2.5C Master Alloy on the Refining Efficiency of the AZ31 Alloy[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2017, 30(6): 505-512.
| Range of particle size (μm) | Number of particles | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.18-0.5 | 55 | 6.67 |
| 0.5-1.0 | 270 | 32.77 |
| 1.0-1.5 | 225 | 27.31 |
| 1.5-2.0 | 108 | 13.11 |
| 2.0-2.5 | 75 | 9.10 |
| 2.5-3.0 | 29 | 3.52 |
| 3.0-3.5 | 26 | 3.16 |
| 3.5-4.0 | 16 | 1.94 |
| 4.0-4.5 | 10 | 1.21 |
| 4.5-5.0 | 3 | 0.36 |
| 5.0-5.5 | 1 | 0.12 |
| 5.5-6.0 | 3 | 0.36 |
| 6.0-6.5 | 1 | 0.12 |
| 6.5-7.0 | 1 | 0.12 |
| 7.0-7.08 | 1 | 0.12 |
Table 1 Statistical data of Al4C3 particles measured
| Range of particle size (μm) | Number of particles | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.18-0.5 | 55 | 6.67 |
| 0.5-1.0 | 270 | 32.77 |
| 1.0-1.5 | 225 | 27.31 |
| 1.5-2.0 | 108 | 13.11 |
| 2.0-2.5 | 75 | 9.10 |
| 2.5-3.0 | 29 | 3.52 |
| 3.0-3.5 | 26 | 3.16 |
| 3.5-4.0 | 16 | 1.94 |
| 4.0-4.5 | 10 | 1.21 |
| 4.5-5.0 | 3 | 0.36 |
| 5.0-5.5 | 1 | 0.12 |
| 5.5-6.0 | 3 | 0.36 |
| 6.0-6.5 | 1 | 0.12 |
| 6.5-7.0 | 1 | 0.12 |
| 7.0-7.08 | 1 | 0.12 |
Fig. 2 a SEM micrograph of solution-treated AZ31 alloy with addition of 1.0 wt% master alloy, b corresponding EDS result of the particle marked in Fig. 2a
Fig. 4 Measured size distribution (shaded bars) of Al4C3 particles in Al-2.5C master alloy with a log-normal fitting curve (solid curve). The inset shows one of the SEM micrographs used for the statistic of the particle size distribution
| Addition amount (wt%) | Element (wt%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | Mn | Zn | Mg | |
| 0 | 2.3471 | 0.2989 | 0.8372 | Balance |
| 0.3 | 2.4279 | 0.3019 | 0.9535 | Balance |
| 0.6 | 2.3883 | 0.2934 | 0.7944 | Balance |
| 1.0 | 2.3564 | 0.2629 | 0.9069 | Balance |
| 1.5 | 2.2959 | 0.2694 | 0.9484 | Balance |
| 2.0 | 2.3816 | 0.3387 | 0.8585 | Balance |
| 3.4 | 2.5284 | 0.1738 | 1.066 | Balance |
Table 2 Analyzed chemical compositions of the AZ31 alloys inoculated with different additions of master alloy
| Addition amount (wt%) | Element (wt%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | Mn | Zn | Mg | |
| 0 | 2.3471 | 0.2989 | 0.8372 | Balance |
| 0.3 | 2.4279 | 0.3019 | 0.9535 | Balance |
| 0.6 | 2.3883 | 0.2934 | 0.7944 | Balance |
| 1.0 | 2.3564 | 0.2629 | 0.9069 | Balance |
| 1.5 | 2.2959 | 0.2694 | 0.9484 | Balance |
| 2.0 | 2.3816 | 0.3387 | 0.8585 | Balance |
| 3.4 | 2.5284 | 0.1738 | 1.066 | Balance |
| Quantity | Symbol | Units | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of particles per unit volume in master alloy | NV | mm-3 | 1.18 × 108 |
| Number of particles per unit area in master alloy | NA | mm-2 | 1.31 × 105 |
| Mean diameter of particles in master alloy* | d0 | mm | 1.11 × 10-3 |
| Total number of particles measured in master alloy* | N | - | 824 |
| Total area measured in master alloy* | AT | mm2 | 6.30 × 10-3 |
| Mass of master alloy* | M1 | g | 100 |
| Volume of master alloy* | V1 | mm3 | 1.20 × 104 |
| Density of master alloy | ρ1 | g mm-3 | 8.33 × 10-3 |
| Mass of AZ31 alloy ingot* | M0 | g | 110 |
| Volume of AZ31 alloy ingot | V0 | mm3 | 6.36 × 104 |
| Density of AZ31 alloy ingot* | ρ0 | g mm-3 | 1.73 × 10-3 |
| Grain size* | D | μm | - |
| Number density of total particles added to AZ31 | N0 | mm-3 | - |
| Number density of effective particles added to AZ31 | Ne | mm-3 | - |
| Addition amount of master alloy* | m | g | - |
| Nucleation efficiency | η | - | - |
| Formula | NA=NATNV=NAd0Ne=0.57D3[ | ||
Table 3 Parameters and formulas used in the calculations
| Quantity | Symbol | Units | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of particles per unit volume in master alloy | NV | mm-3 | 1.18 × 108 |
| Number of particles per unit area in master alloy | NA | mm-2 | 1.31 × 105 |
| Mean diameter of particles in master alloy* | d0 | mm | 1.11 × 10-3 |
| Total number of particles measured in master alloy* | N | - | 824 |
| Total area measured in master alloy* | AT | mm2 | 6.30 × 10-3 |
| Mass of master alloy* | M1 | g | 100 |
| Volume of master alloy* | V1 | mm3 | 1.20 × 104 |
| Density of master alloy | ρ1 | g mm-3 | 8.33 × 10-3 |
| Mass of AZ31 alloy ingot* | M0 | g | 110 |
| Volume of AZ31 alloy ingot | V0 | mm3 | 6.36 × 104 |
| Density of AZ31 alloy ingot* | ρ0 | g mm-3 | 1.73 × 10-3 |
| Grain size* | D | μm | - |
| Number density of total particles added to AZ31 | N0 | mm-3 | - |
| Number density of effective particles added to AZ31 | Ne | mm-3 | - |
| Addition amount of master alloy* | m | g | - |
| Nucleation efficiency | η | - | - |
| Formula | NA=NATNV=NAd0Ne=0.57D3[ | ||
| Addition amount of master alloy (g) | Grain size (μm) | Number density of total particles (mm-3) | Number density of effective particles (mm-3) | Nucleation efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 114 | 6.67 × 104 | 385 | 0.58 |
| 0.6 | 84 | 1.33 × 105 | 962 | 0.72 |
| 1.0 | 70 | 2.22 × 105 | 1662 | 0.75 |
| 1.5 | 117 | 3.34 × 105 | 356 | 0.11 |
| 2.0 | 111 | 4.45 × 105 | 417 | 0.09 |
| 3.4 | 124 | 7.56 × 105 | 299 | 0.04 |
Table 4 Calculation results corresponding to different additions of refiner
| Addition amount of master alloy (g) | Grain size (μm) | Number density of total particles (mm-3) | Number density of effective particles (mm-3) | Nucleation efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 114 | 6.67 × 104 | 385 | 0.58 |
| 0.6 | 84 | 1.33 × 105 | 962 | 0.72 |
| 1.0 | 70 | 2.22 × 105 | 1662 | 0.75 |
| 1.5 | 117 | 3.34 × 105 | 356 | 0.11 |
| 2.0 | 111 | 4.45 × 105 | 417 | 0.09 |
| 3.4 | 124 | 7.56 × 105 | 299 | 0.04 |
|
| [1] | Wei-Peng Chen, Jia-Qi Pei, Hua Hou, Yu-Hong Zhao. Phase-field simulation of α-Mg dendrite growth in magnesium alloys: A review [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 48-61. |
| [2] | Hong Ju, Cheng Wang, Wei-Jiang Guo, Zhao-Yuan Meng, Peng Chen, Hui-Yuan Wang. Solute Segregation and Grain Boundary Cohesion of Magnesium Binary Alloys: A First-Principles Study [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(12): 2179-2196. |
| [3] | Zhenfei Jiang, Bo Hu, Zixin Li, Fanjin Yao, Jiaxuan Han, Dejiang Li, Xiaoqin Zeng, Wenjiang Ding. A Review of Magnesium Alloys as Structure-Function Integrated Materials [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(8): 1301-1338. |
| [4] | Ze-Song Wei, Zi-You Ding, Lei Cai, Shao-Xia Ma, Dong-Qing Zhao, Lan-Yue Cui, Cheng-Bao Liu, Yuan-Sheng Yang, Yuan-Ding Huang, Rong-Chang Zeng. Exfoliation Corrosion of As-Extruded Mg-1Li-1Ca: the Influence of the Superficial Layer [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(8): 1339-1353. |
| [5] | Zhaochen Yu, Kaixuan Feng, Shuyun Deng, Yang Chen, Hong Yan, Honggun Song, Chao Luo, Zhi Hu. Quasi-in-situ Observation and SKPFM Studies on Phosphate Protective Film and Surface Micro-Galvanic Corrosion in Biological Mg-3Zn-xNd Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(4): 648-664. |
| [6] | Wenjun Tian, Yunxuan Zhou, Tao Deng, Tao Chen, Jun Tan, Xianhua Chen, Fusheng Pan. Probing the Structural Stability, Mechanical, Electronic, and Thermodynamic Properties of Mg-Y-Zn Ternary Compounds via First-Principles Calculations [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(10): 1703-1720. |
| [7] |
Chao Wang, Xi Zhao, Yayun He, Dingxia Zheng.
Implementation of Balanced Strength and Toughness of VW93A Rare-Earth Magnesium Alloy with Regulating the Overlapping Structure of Lamellar LPSO Phase and |
| [8] | Baotian Du, Zijian Yu, Kang Shi, Ke Liu, Shubo Li, Wenbo Du. Improving the Mechanical Properties of Mg-Gd-Y-Ag-Zr Alloy via Pre-Strain and Two-Stage Ageing [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(3): 456-468. |
| [9] | Yun Zhang, Chen Jiang, Shaoheng Sun, Wei Xu, Quan Yang, Yongjun Zhang, Shiwei Tian, Xiaoge Duan, Zhe Xu, Haitao Jiang. Microstructural Evolution during Tensile Deformation in TRC-ZA21 Magnesium Alloy with Different Loading Directions and Strain Rates [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(2): 192-214. |
| [10] | Guoqiang Xi, Xuhan Zhao, Yanlong Ma, Yu Mou, Ju Xiong, Kai Ma, Jingfeng Wang. Comparative Study on Corrosion Behavior and Mechanism of As-Cast Mg-Zn-Y and Mg-Zn-Gd Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(2): 310-322. |
| [11] | Yongqiao Li, Lifei Wang, Xiaohuan Pan, Qiang Zhang, Guangsheng Huang, Bin Xing, Weili Cheng, Hongxia Wang, Kwang Seon Shin. Effect of Pre-stretch Strain at High Temperatures on the Formability of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Sheets [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(1): 48-60. |
| [12] | Chunxiao Li, Hong Yan, Rongshi Chen. Microstructure and Texture Evolution of Mg-14Gd-0.5Zr Alloy during Rolling and Annealing under Different Temperatures [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(1): 61-76. |
| [13] | Bao-Chang Liu, Shuai Zhang, Hong-Wei Xiong, Wen-Hao Dai, Yin-Long Ma. Effect of Al Content on the Corrosion Behavior of Extruded Dilute Mg-Al-Ca-Mn Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(1): 77-90. |
| [14] | Yanan Wang, Sansan Shuai, Chenglin Huang, Tao Jing, Chaoyue Chen, Tao Hu, Jiang Wang, Zhongming Ren. Revealing the Diversity of Dendritic Morphology Evolution During Solidification of Magnesium Alloys using Synchrotron X-ray Imaging: A Review [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2022, 35(2): 177-200. |
| [15] | Lin-Yue Jia, Wen-Bo Du, Jin-Long Fu, Zhao-Hui Wang, Ke Liu, Shu-Bo Li, Xian Du. Obtaining Ultra-High Strength and Ductility in a Mg-Gd-Er-Zn-Zr Alloy via Extrusion, Pre-deformation and Two-Stage Aging [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(1): 39-44. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
WeChat
