Metals Advances ›› 2026, Vol. 41: 29-44.DOI: 10.1016/j.metadv.2026.02.007
• Review Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Dinghao Luoa,1, Jiaxin Lib,1, Zhaoyang Rana, Lin Suna, Tinglong Chena, Yongqiang Haoa,c,d,e,*(
), Liang Denga,c,d,e,*(
)
Received:2025-11-18
Revised:2025-12-15
Accepted:2025-12-29
Online:2026-03-10
Published:2026-02-07
Contact:
*Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China. E-mail addresses: About author:1These authors contribute equally to this work.
Dinghao Luo, Jiaxin Li, Zhaoyang Ran, Lin Sun, Tinglong Chen, Yongqiang Hao, Liang Deng. Novel functional metallic materials for the treatment of bone disorders: Current progress and promising research directions[J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 41: 29-44.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Fig. 1. Representative evidence and current research needs in orthopedic implants. Green: High demand—currently supported by limited evidence or some evidence exists but with substantial research potential; Yellow: Moderate demand—currently supported by a modest body of evidence; Red: Low demand—supported by extensive evidence, potentially reaching consensus; Gray: No evidence to date, or existing evidence is conflicting.
Fig. 2. Performance evaluation of functional Ta-based materials. (A) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs illustrating hBMSCs adhered on porous Ta and Ti6Al4V scaffolds. (B, C) Morphological analysis of hBMSCs and fluorescence labeling with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and phalloidin on the porous scaffolds. (D) Quantification of cell adhesion on the tested scaffolds. Higher optical density (OD) values indicate increased cell number, enhanced cell viability, and greater adhesion. (E) Cell proliferation on porous Ta and Ti6Al4V scaffolds. Higher OD values reflect greater cell growth or viability in the Ta group (*P < 0.05 versus Ti6Al4V group) (reproduced with permission from Ref. [22], Copyright (2018), American Chemical Society); (F) ALP staining after 7 days and 14 days incubation, Alizarin red staining after 21 days and 28 days incubation; (G) The amount of calcium ion concentration absorbed in the osteogenic induction medium every 4 days from the fourth day. Measurements were carried out in triplicate. Data were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05); (H) Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining after RANKL induction 5 days and 7 days (reproduced with permission from Ref. [25], Copyright (2017), Elsevier B.V.).
| Performance/field | Category of requirements | Representative evidence | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promotion of proliferation and adhesion | C | Ta enhances the adhesion and proliferation of BMSCs. | [ |
| Ta promotes the proliferation of dental pulp stem cell (DPSCs). | [ | ||
| Promotion of osteogenic differentiation | C | Ta significantly increases the ALP activity of BMSCs. | [ |
| Ta enhances matrix mineralization. | [ | ||
| Ta upregulates the protein level of OCN, collagen type I (COL1), and RUNX2 (Western blot analysis). | [ | ||
| Ta elevates the mRNA levels of OCN and RUNX2. | [ | ||
| Ta promotes mineral deposition of DPSCs on its surface. | [ | ||
| Inhibition of osteoclasts | B | Ta-coated screws demonstrate inhibitory effects on osteoclast activity. | [ |
| Compared with titanium, Ta shows a lower tendency to induce osteoclastic differentiation. | [ | ||
| Increased osteoclast presence around Ta implants. | [ | ||
| Promotion of angiogenesis | A | Ta5O2 coatings upregulate HIF-1 mRNA expression, thereby indirectly enhancing angiogenesis. | [ |
| Ta-coated titanium nanotubes exhibit comparable scratch migration and tube formation to non-coated counterparts but display stronger tube formation than blank controls. | [ | ||
| Ta-coated titanium nanotubes upregulate FGFR mRNA levels in HUVECs compared with pure titanium nanotubes. | [ | ||
| Immunomodulation | A | Nanostructured Ta promotes M2 macrophage polarization while suppressing M1 polarization. | [ |
| A weak negative correlation has been observed between blood Ta levels and HLA-DR1/CD81⁺ T-cell concentrations in humans. | [ | ||
| Antimicrobial activity | D | Staphylococcus aureus exhibits reduced adhesion to Ta compared with titanium alloys and stainless steel. | [ |
| Ta achieves stronger in vivo antibacterial activity than titanium, potentially by inducing bacterial adhesion and subsequent detachment from cell surfaces. | [ | ||
| Ta-coated titanium nanotubes show no significant improvement in antibacterial properties over pure titanium. | [ | ||
| Superior/precisely tunable mechanical performance | B | Ta exhibits a controllable elastic modulus and compressive strength. | [ |
| Ta enhances the compressive strength and elastic modulus of PEEK composites. | [ | ||
| Clinical applications | B | Radial osteosarcoma. | [ |
| Carpal osteonecrosis. | [ | ||
| Knee revision. | [ | ||
| Hip revision. | [ | ||
| Large femoral infectious defects. | [ | ||
| Talar necrosis. | [ |
Table 1. Representative evidence and current research needs of Ta in orthopedic implants.
| Performance/field | Category of requirements | Representative evidence | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promotion of proliferation and adhesion | C | Ta enhances the adhesion and proliferation of BMSCs. | [ |
| Ta promotes the proliferation of dental pulp stem cell (DPSCs). | [ | ||
| Promotion of osteogenic differentiation | C | Ta significantly increases the ALP activity of BMSCs. | [ |
| Ta enhances matrix mineralization. | [ | ||
| Ta upregulates the protein level of OCN, collagen type I (COL1), and RUNX2 (Western blot analysis). | [ | ||
| Ta elevates the mRNA levels of OCN and RUNX2. | [ | ||
| Ta promotes mineral deposition of DPSCs on its surface. | [ | ||
| Inhibition of osteoclasts | B | Ta-coated screws demonstrate inhibitory effects on osteoclast activity. | [ |
| Compared with titanium, Ta shows a lower tendency to induce osteoclastic differentiation. | [ | ||
| Increased osteoclast presence around Ta implants. | [ | ||
| Promotion of angiogenesis | A | Ta5O2 coatings upregulate HIF-1 mRNA expression, thereby indirectly enhancing angiogenesis. | [ |
| Ta-coated titanium nanotubes exhibit comparable scratch migration and tube formation to non-coated counterparts but display stronger tube formation than blank controls. | [ | ||
| Ta-coated titanium nanotubes upregulate FGFR mRNA levels in HUVECs compared with pure titanium nanotubes. | [ | ||
| Immunomodulation | A | Nanostructured Ta promotes M2 macrophage polarization while suppressing M1 polarization. | [ |
| A weak negative correlation has been observed between blood Ta levels and HLA-DR1/CD81⁺ T-cell concentrations in humans. | [ | ||
| Antimicrobial activity | D | Staphylococcus aureus exhibits reduced adhesion to Ta compared with titanium alloys and stainless steel. | [ |
| Ta achieves stronger in vivo antibacterial activity than titanium, potentially by inducing bacterial adhesion and subsequent detachment from cell surfaces. | [ | ||
| Ta-coated titanium nanotubes show no significant improvement in antibacterial properties over pure titanium. | [ | ||
| Superior/precisely tunable mechanical performance | B | Ta exhibits a controllable elastic modulus and compressive strength. | [ |
| Ta enhances the compressive strength and elastic modulus of PEEK composites. | [ | ||
| Clinical applications | B | Radial osteosarcoma. | [ |
| Carpal osteonecrosis. | [ | ||
| Knee revision. | [ | ||
| Hip revision. | [ | ||
| Large femoral infectious defects. | [ | ||
| Talar necrosis. | [ |
| Performance/field | Category of requirements | Representative evidence | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promotion of proliferation and adhesion | C | Mg coatings on Ti6Al4V enhance MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation and adhesion. | [ |
| Mg2+-containing dual-crosslinked hydrogel scaffolds promote BMSC adhesion and proliferation. | [ | ||
| Promotion of osteogenic differentiation | C | Mg implants upregulate intracellular ALP activity. | [ |
| Mg implants stimulate extracellular matrix mineralization. | [ | ||
| Mg implants promote osteogenic healing in vivo. | [ | ||
| Mg-containing implants induce endosteal bone formation in rats, with more orderly alignment of hydroxyapatite and collagen fibers around the implant. | [ | ||
| Inhibition of osteoclasts | B | Mg inhibits the NFATc1 and NF-κB pathways, thereby preventing wear particle-induced osteoclastogenesis. | [ |
| Elevated extracellular Mg enhances VD₃-induced osteoclast differentiation while reducing osteoblast formation. | [ | ||
| Promotion of angiogenesis | C | Three-dimensional printed scaffolds incorporating Mg-containing micro-nano bioactive glass (MNBG) increase CD31+ cell ratios and upregulate angiogenesis-related genes (FGF-2, SDF, angiogenin) in HUVECs. | [ |
| Mg-coated Ti6Al4V improves endothelial cell proliferation, adhesion, tube formation, wound healing, and Transwell migration. | [ | ||
| Hydrogels containing Mg ions and modified polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane promote angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. | [ | ||
| Electrospun membranes with Mg oxide stimulate HUVEC proliferation and VEGF production. | [ | ||
| Immunomodulation | B | Mg microsphere-based bone cement upregulates IL-10 expression and M2 macrophage polarization with elevated CD206 levels, facilitating bone repair through immune modulation. | [ |
| Mg alloys also promote M2 macrophage polarization and IL-10 secretion, enhancing osteogenesis of PDSCs via the JAK1-STAT3 pathway. | [ | ||
| Antimicrobial activity | D | Mg-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes reduce bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on implant surfaces. | [ |
| Superior/precisely tunable mechanical performance | A | Porous WE43 Mg alloy scaffolds exhibit compressive strength and elastic modulus comparable to cancellous bone. | [ |
| After heat treatment and high-temperature oxidation, selective laser-melted WE43 scaffolds maintain mechanical stability for six weeks in vivo, consistent with the rate of bone regeneration. | [ | ||
| Clinical applications | A | Hallux valgus. | [ |
| Radial and metacarpal fracture. | [ | ||
| Vascularized bone grafting for femoral head necrosis. | [ |
Table 2. Representative evidence and current research needs of Mg in orthopedic implants.
| Performance/field | Category of requirements | Representative evidence | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promotion of proliferation and adhesion | C | Mg coatings on Ti6Al4V enhance MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation and adhesion. | [ |
| Mg2+-containing dual-crosslinked hydrogel scaffolds promote BMSC adhesion and proliferation. | [ | ||
| Promotion of osteogenic differentiation | C | Mg implants upregulate intracellular ALP activity. | [ |
| Mg implants stimulate extracellular matrix mineralization. | [ | ||
| Mg implants promote osteogenic healing in vivo. | [ | ||
| Mg-containing implants induce endosteal bone formation in rats, with more orderly alignment of hydroxyapatite and collagen fibers around the implant. | [ | ||
| Inhibition of osteoclasts | B | Mg inhibits the NFATc1 and NF-κB pathways, thereby preventing wear particle-induced osteoclastogenesis. | [ |
| Elevated extracellular Mg enhances VD₃-induced osteoclast differentiation while reducing osteoblast formation. | [ | ||
| Promotion of angiogenesis | C | Three-dimensional printed scaffolds incorporating Mg-containing micro-nano bioactive glass (MNBG) increase CD31+ cell ratios and upregulate angiogenesis-related genes (FGF-2, SDF, angiogenin) in HUVECs. | [ |
| Mg-coated Ti6Al4V improves endothelial cell proliferation, adhesion, tube formation, wound healing, and Transwell migration. | [ | ||
| Hydrogels containing Mg ions and modified polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane promote angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. | [ | ||
| Electrospun membranes with Mg oxide stimulate HUVEC proliferation and VEGF production. | [ | ||
| Immunomodulation | B | Mg microsphere-based bone cement upregulates IL-10 expression and M2 macrophage polarization with elevated CD206 levels, facilitating bone repair through immune modulation. | [ |
| Mg alloys also promote M2 macrophage polarization and IL-10 secretion, enhancing osteogenesis of PDSCs via the JAK1-STAT3 pathway. | [ | ||
| Antimicrobial activity | D | Mg-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes reduce bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on implant surfaces. | [ |
| Superior/precisely tunable mechanical performance | A | Porous WE43 Mg alloy scaffolds exhibit compressive strength and elastic modulus comparable to cancellous bone. | [ |
| After heat treatment and high-temperature oxidation, selective laser-melted WE43 scaffolds maintain mechanical stability for six weeks in vivo, consistent with the rate of bone regeneration. | [ | ||
| Clinical applications | A | Hallux valgus. | [ |
| Radial and metacarpal fracture. | [ | ||
| Vascularized bone grafting for femoral head necrosis. | [ |
Fig. 3. Performance evaluation of functional Mg-based materials. (A-F) Proliferation and viability of MC3T3-E1 cells (A, B, C) and HUVECs (D, E, F) by Calcein acetoxymethyl ester (Calcein-AM/PI) double stain after one week cultivation. (G, H) Quantitative analysis demonstrated that high cell density was maintained in Mg group. Asterisks (*) indicate statistical significance compared with the Ti and pM groups, P < 0.05 (reproduced with permission from Ref. [61], Copyright (2020), Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.). (I-K) Radiography preoperative (I) and 6 (J, K) weeks postoperative of a 46-year-old woman. Radiolucency is visible both around the screw in the bone and dorsal to the screw in the soft-tissues. Clinically some swelling, reddening and pain were noticed. (L) A CT scan was performed 8 weeks postoperative confirming the osteolysis. The Hounsfield units are comparable to gas (reproduced with permission from Ref. [64], Copyright (2016), Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.).
| Performance/field | Category of requirements | Representative evidence | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promotion of proliferation and adhesion | C | Titanium-Cu alloys enhance MG63 cell adhesion and proliferation. | [ |
| Cu-containing microporous TiO2 coatings promote MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion and growth. | [ | ||
| Promotion of osteogenic differentiation | C | Adding 5 wt% Cu to titanium upregulates ALP, COL-1, OPN, and OCN expression, thereby promoting MG63 osteogenic differentiation. | [ |
| Ti-5Cu alloys enhance ALP activity, increase COL-1 production, and upregulate RUNX2, OPN, and BMP-2 gene expression. | [ | ||
| Incorporating Cu into microporous TiO2 coatings further promotes osteogenic differentiation and improves in vivo osseointegration. | [ | ||
| Inhibition of osteoclasts | D | Cu rods implanted in rat tibiae elicit a fibrous matrix response with abundant osteoclast-like M1 macrophages. | [ |
| Cu-containing Ti/Zr-based metallic glasses promote local osteoclast formation and resorptive activity. | [ | ||
| Cu-doped Co29Cr9W3Cu wear particles downregulate NF-κB and its downstream osteoclastic markers (TRAP, NFATc1, Cathepsin-K), reducing osteoclast number and osteolytic area in murine calvaria. | [ | ||
| Promotion of angiogenesis | B | Bioactive borate glass containing 0.4 wt% Cu enhances angiogenesis more effectively than Cu-free glass fibers. | [ |
| Cu-containing coatings with controlled ion release via biopeptides promote angiogenesis in vitro. | [ | ||
| In vivo, Cu implants induce thicker fibrous capsules and more neovascularization than titanium. | [ | ||
| PEEK coated with a polydopamine (PDA)/Cu composite layer further enhances vascularization. | [ | ||
| Immunomodulation | A | Cu- and Sr-ion-modified 3D-printed titanium alloys induce M1 macrophage polarization to trigger pro-inflammatory immune responses for infection control. | [ |
| Cu-Sr synergism promotes macrophage secretion of osteogenic cytokines to enhance bone formation. | [ | ||
| Cu-containing Co29Cr9W3Cu wear particles stimulate M2 macrophage polarization and IL-10 upregulation, while suppressing M1 polarization and downregulating TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. | [ | ||
| Antimicrobial activity | C | Ti-5Cu alloys induce CsoR and SOD upregulation in Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii, disrupting Cu homeostasis and oxidative stress to achieve antibacterial effects. | [ |
| Cu-coated titanium implants inhibit Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis activity. | [ | ||
| Titanium implants coated with PDA/PPy/Cu nanoparticle/Dex composites exhibit enhanced photothermal and ROS-mediated antibacterial effects. | [ | ||
| Superior/precisely tunable mechanical performance | B | Ti-5Cu alloys show 19.7% higher yield strength and 21.6% higher tensile strength than Cu-free controls. | [ |
| Titanium-Cu fixation screws demonstrate stronger bone-implant bonding over time than pure titanium screws. | [ | ||
| Incorporation of Ce and Cu into calcium silicate enables tunable degradation and mechanical properties compatible with bone healing. | [ | ||
| Clinical applications | D | No formal clinical applications have yet been reported for Cu-based orthopedic implants. | / |
Table 3. Representative evidence and current research needs of Cu in orthopedic implants.
| Performance/field | Category of requirements | Representative evidence | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promotion of proliferation and adhesion | C | Titanium-Cu alloys enhance MG63 cell adhesion and proliferation. | [ |
| Cu-containing microporous TiO2 coatings promote MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion and growth. | [ | ||
| Promotion of osteogenic differentiation | C | Adding 5 wt% Cu to titanium upregulates ALP, COL-1, OPN, and OCN expression, thereby promoting MG63 osteogenic differentiation. | [ |
| Ti-5Cu alloys enhance ALP activity, increase COL-1 production, and upregulate RUNX2, OPN, and BMP-2 gene expression. | [ | ||
| Incorporating Cu into microporous TiO2 coatings further promotes osteogenic differentiation and improves in vivo osseointegration. | [ | ||
| Inhibition of osteoclasts | D | Cu rods implanted in rat tibiae elicit a fibrous matrix response with abundant osteoclast-like M1 macrophages. | [ |
| Cu-containing Ti/Zr-based metallic glasses promote local osteoclast formation and resorptive activity. | [ | ||
| Cu-doped Co29Cr9W3Cu wear particles downregulate NF-κB and its downstream osteoclastic markers (TRAP, NFATc1, Cathepsin-K), reducing osteoclast number and osteolytic area in murine calvaria. | [ | ||
| Promotion of angiogenesis | B | Bioactive borate glass containing 0.4 wt% Cu enhances angiogenesis more effectively than Cu-free glass fibers. | [ |
| Cu-containing coatings with controlled ion release via biopeptides promote angiogenesis in vitro. | [ | ||
| In vivo, Cu implants induce thicker fibrous capsules and more neovascularization than titanium. | [ | ||
| PEEK coated with a polydopamine (PDA)/Cu composite layer further enhances vascularization. | [ | ||
| Immunomodulation | A | Cu- and Sr-ion-modified 3D-printed titanium alloys induce M1 macrophage polarization to trigger pro-inflammatory immune responses for infection control. | [ |
| Cu-Sr synergism promotes macrophage secretion of osteogenic cytokines to enhance bone formation. | [ | ||
| Cu-containing Co29Cr9W3Cu wear particles stimulate M2 macrophage polarization and IL-10 upregulation, while suppressing M1 polarization and downregulating TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. | [ | ||
| Antimicrobial activity | C | Ti-5Cu alloys induce CsoR and SOD upregulation in Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii, disrupting Cu homeostasis and oxidative stress to achieve antibacterial effects. | [ |
| Cu-coated titanium implants inhibit Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis activity. | [ | ||
| Titanium implants coated with PDA/PPy/Cu nanoparticle/Dex composites exhibit enhanced photothermal and ROS-mediated antibacterial effects. | [ | ||
| Superior/precisely tunable mechanical performance | B | Ti-5Cu alloys show 19.7% higher yield strength and 21.6% higher tensile strength than Cu-free controls. | [ |
| Titanium-Cu fixation screws demonstrate stronger bone-implant bonding over time than pure titanium screws. | [ | ||
| Incorporation of Ce and Cu into calcium silicate enables tunable degradation and mechanical properties compatible with bone healing. | [ | ||
| Clinical applications | D | No formal clinical applications have yet been reported for Cu-based orthopedic implants. | / |
Fig. 4. Performance evaluation of functional Cu-based materials. (A) Adhesion and morphology of human osteosarcoma cell line-63 (MG-63) cells on Ti and Ti-Cu alloy surfaces. Fluorescent images of MG-63 cells cultured on Ti and Ti-Cu alloys for 4 and 24 h, with actin stained using Rhodamine Phalloidin (red) and nuclei stained with DAPI (blue). (B) SEM micrographs showing MG‐63 cell morphology on Ti and Ti-Cu alloy surfaces after 1 and 3 days of culture (reproduced with permission from Ref. [68], Copyright (2019), Springer Science Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature). (C) Typical confocal images of Fn (F. nucleatum, the upper row) and Pg (P. gingivalis, the bottom row) cultured on each sample for 1 d. The green fluorescence indicated live bacteria, and the dead ones are in red, together with the results of quantification. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Scale bar is 75 μm (reproduced with permission from Ref. [99], Copyright (2023)).
Fig. 5. Performance evaluation of other functional metallic materials. (A) Representative images of bone defect healing at 15, 30, and 60 days post-implantation under different treatment conditions. The treatment groups included AB (autogenous bone), DBBM (deproteinized bovine bone mineral), SHAM (sham operation), and BAGNb (poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) and niobium-containing bioactive glass scaffold); (B) Quantitative assessment of bone density across the defect region at various postoperative time points (reproduced with permission from Ref. [135], Copyright (2021), John Wiley & Sons Ltd.). (C) Fluorescence micrographs showing Hoechst-33258-stained nuclei of pre-osteoblasts cultured for 1 h and 24 h on Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy surfaces. The results demonstrated that the initial cell attachment on the Ti-6Al-7Nb surface was higher than that observed on the Ti-6Al-4V alloy (reproduced with permission from Ref. [136], Copyright (2013), Wiley Periodicals, Inc.).
| [1] | M. Alhajhamoud, L. Candan, M.A. Ilgaz, I. Cinar, S. Ozbey, S. Čorović, D. Miljavec, E. Kayahan, Materials 15 (2022) 15062248. |
| [2] |
D. Gore, R.Q. Frazer, R.E. Kovarik, J.E. Yepes, J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants 15 (2005) 673-686.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
F.A. Shah, M. Trobos, P. Thomsen, A. Palmquist, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 62 (2016) 960-966.
DOI URL |
| [4] | K. Thalavai Pandian, M. Neikter, F. Bahbou, T. Hansson, R. Pederson, Materials 15 (2022) 15103624. |
| [5] |
Y.W. Cui, L.Q. Wang, L.C. Zhang, Prog. Mater. Sci. 144 (2024) 101277.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
N. Wu, H. Gao, X. Wang, X. Pei, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 9 (2023) 2970-2990.
DOI URL |
| [7] | L.Y. Chen, P. Qin, L.N. Zhang, L.C. Zhang, Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 6 (2024) 052006. |
| [8] |
F. Mottaghitalab, H. Hosseinkhani, M.A. Shokrgozar, C.B. Mao, M.Y. Yang, M. Farokhi, J. Control. Release 215 (2015) 112-128.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
P. Habibovic, Tissue Eng. Part A 23 (2017) 1295-1296.
DOI URL |
| [10] | Y. Li, D. Jiang, R. Zhu, C. Yang, L. Wang, L. Zhang, Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 7 (2025) 2631-2644. |
| [11] | C. Shi, J. Shi, Z. Guan, J. Ge, Materials 16 (2023) 16083144. |
| [12] |
P. Pareatumbee, S. Zainul-Abidin, A. Yew, S.M. Chou, T.S. Howe, J.S.B. Koh, M.H. Tan, J. Orthop. Res. 41 (2023) 1139-1147.
DOI URL |
| [13] | Z. Yao, S.J. Getting, I.C. Locke, Cells 11 (2021) 11010132. |
| [14] | W. Su, G. Liu, X. Liu, Y. Zhou, Q. Sun, G. Zhen, X. Wang, Y. Hu, P. Gao, S. Demehri, X. Cao, M. Wan, JCI Insight 5 (2020) 135446. |
| [15] |
Z.Y. Chen, S. Gao, Y.W. Zhang, R.B. Zhou, F. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem. B 9 (2021) 2594-2612.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
X. Chen, Z. Wan, L. Yang, S. Song, Z. Fu, K. Tang, L. Chen, Y. Song, J. Nanobiotechnol. 20 (2022) 110-131.
DOI |
| [17] |
H. Matsuno, A. Yokoyama, F. Watari, M. Uo, T. Kawasaki, Biomaterials 22 (2001) 1253-1262.
PMID |
| [18] |
X.Y. Wang, K. Zhou, Y.D. Li, H. Xie, B.J. Wang, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 (2023) 1127939.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
G. Mani, D. Porter, K. Grove, S. Collins, A. Ornberg, R. Shulfer, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 110 (2022) 1291-1306.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
G. Huang, S.T. Pan, J.X. Qiu, Materials 14 (2021) 2647.
DOI URL |
| [21] | M.M. Lu, P.S. Wu, X.J. Guo, L.L. Yin, H.L. Cao, D. Zou, Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 22 (2018) 7087-7104. |
| [22] |
Y. Guo, K. Xie, W.B. Jiang, L. Wang, G.Y. Li, S. Zhao, W. Wu, Y.Q. Hao, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5 (2019) 1123-1133.
DOI |
| [23] |
S. Chen, C.D. Zhang, D.Q. Xiao, F. Shi, K. Liu, Y.X. Wan, K. Duan, J. Weng, G. Feng, Y.R. Yin, Surf. Coat. Technol. 426 (2021) 127769.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
C.J. Zhang, E. Xie, Z.Y. Zhong, F. Wang, S.Y. Xie, S.H. Huang, D.J. Li, P. Sun, B.Q. Yu, Compos. Part B Eng. 296 (2025) 112242.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
L.Y. Shi, A. Wang, F.Z. Zang, J.X. Wang, X.W. Pan, H.J. Chen, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 160 (2017) 22-32.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
C.Q. Luo, C.R. Wang, X.D. Wu, X.P. Xie, C. Wang, C. Zhao, C. Zou, F.R. Lv, W. Huang, J.Y. Liao, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 129 (2021) 112382.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
P. Duan, L.F. Bonewald, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 77 (2016) 23-29.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
M. Lu, X. Zhuang, K. Tang, P. Wu, X. Guo, L. Yin, H. Cao, D. Zou, Cell Physiol. Biochem. 51 (2018) 589-609.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
H. Qian, T. Lei, Z.M. Ye, Y.H. Hu, P.F. Lei, Biomed Res. Int. 2020 (2020) 5162524.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
L. Wang, X. Hu, X. Ma, Z. Ma, Y. Zhang, Y. Lu, X. Li, W. Lei, Y. Feng, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 148 (2016) 440-452.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
Q.L. Huang, J. Wan, Z.X. Ouyang, T. Li, D.P. Zhao, H. Wu, T. Liu, W. Zhang, L.X. Liang, Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 54 (2023) 100716.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
S. Wu, X. Shen, M. Chen, K.H.R. Yie, Z. Zhou, M.A. Al-Baadani, K. Fang, A.M. Al- Bishari, Z. Deng, J. Liu, L. Yao, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 120 (2021) 111777.
DOI URL |
| [33] | F. Mammoli, S. Castiglioni, S. Parenti, C. Cappadone, G. Farruggia, S. Iotti, P. Davalli, J.A.M. Maier, A. Grande, C. Frassineti, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (2019) 20020385. |
| [34] | Y. Sun, T. Liu, H. Hu, Z. Xiong, K. Zhang, X. He, W. Liu, P. Lei, Y. Hu, Mater. Today Bio 16 (2022) 100340. |
| [35] |
A. Brüggemann, H. Mallmin, M. Bengtsson, N.P. Hailer, Am J. Bone Joint Surg. 102 (2020) 368-374.
DOI URL |
| [36] |
T.A. Schildhauer, B. Robie, G. Muhr, M. Köller, J. Orthop. Trauma 20 (2006) 476-484.
DOI PMID |
| [37] |
X. Chen, Y.K. Bi, M.R. Huang, H.L. Cao, H. Qin, J. Funct. Biomater. 13 (2022) 264.
DOI URL |
| [38] |
A.G. Illarionov, S.I. Stepanov, I.A. Naschetnikova, A.A. Popov, P. Soundappan, K.H.T. Raman, S. Suwas, Materials 16 (2023) 991.
DOI URL |
| [39] |
E.G. Brodie, K.J. Robinson, E. Sigston, A. Molotnikov, J.E. Frith, ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 4 (2021) 1003-1014.
DOI URL |
| [40] | S. Piglionico, J. Bousquet, N. Fatima, M. Renaud, P.Y. Collart-Dutilleul, P. Bousquet, J. Clin. Med. 9 (2020) 113657. |
| [41] | X. Chen, Y. Bi, M. Huang, H. Cao, H. Qin, J. Funct. Biomater. 13 (2022) 40264. |
| [42] |
G. Chen, Y.R. Yin, C. Chen, Medicine 100 (2021) e27899.
DOI URL |
| [43] |
C.G. Zhang, H. Chen, H.Q. Fan, R. Xiong, R. He, C.J. Huang, Y. Peng, P.F. Yang, G.X. Chen, F.Y. Wang, L. Yang, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 (2023) 1234052.
DOI URL |
| [44] | F.Y. Wang, H. Chen, P.F. Yang, A. Muheremu, P. He, H.Q. Fan, L. Yang, J. Int. Med. Res. 48 (2020) 0300060519891280. |
| [45] |
Y.N. Ao, L. Guo, H. Chen, R. He, P.F. Yang, D.J. Fu, L.C.A. Gu, Y. Peng, R. Xiong, L. Yang, F.Y. Wang, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 (2022) 925339.
DOI URL |
| [46] |
Z.H. Wang, Z. Wang, L.C. Gu, Y. Zhang, T. Su, J.M. Luo, C.J. Huang, X.Y. Gong, Y. Peng, G.X. Chen, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 13 (2025) 1557882.
DOI URL |
| [47] |
J. Ying, L. Cheng, J. Li, B. Wu, X. Qiu, T. Zhang, F. Wang, B. Liu, L. Yang, D.B. Pokharel, H. Xie, F. Wang, Y. Liu, M. Xu, H. Yu, D. Zhao, Orthop. Surg. 15 (2023) 1264-1271.
DOI URL |
| [48] |
Y.P. Wu, X.W. Shi, S.N. Zi, M.J. Li, S.L. Chen, C.Q. Zhang, Y.Q. Xu, J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 17 (2022) 479.
DOI |
| [49] |
M.M. Cohen, M. Kazak, J. Foot Ankle Surg. 54 (2015) 1172-1177.
DOI URL |
| [50] |
X. Wang, W.T. Liu, X.D. Yu, B.Y. Wang, Y. Xu, X. Yan, X.W. Zhang, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 (2022) 983695.
DOI URL |
| [51] |
Y. Zhou, M. Li, Y. Cheng, Y.F. Zheng, T.F. Xi, S.C. Wei, Surf. Coat. Technol. 228 (2013) S2-S6.
DOI URL |
| [52] |
T. Lu, J. Wen, S. Qian, H.L. Cao, C.Q. Ning, X.X. Pan, X.Q. Jiang, X.Y. Liu, P.K. Chu, Biomaterials 51 (2015) 173-183.
DOI URL |
| [53] |
J.D. Bobyn, G.J. Stackpool, S.A. Hacking, M. Tanzer, J.J. Krygier, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 81 (1999) 907-914.
DOI URL |
| [54] |
J.D. Bobyn, R.A. Poggie, J.J. Krygier, D.G. Lewallen, A.D. Hanssen, R.J. Lewis, A.S. Unger, T.J. O'Keefe, M.J. Christie, S. Nasser, J.E. Wood, S.D. Stulberg, M. Tanzer, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 86 (2004) 123-129.
DOI URL |
| [55] | C. Liu, Z. Ren, Y. Xu, S. Pang, X. Zhao, Y. Zhao, Scanning 2018 (2018) 9216314. |
| [56] |
U. Riaz, L. Rakesh, I. Shabib, W. Haider, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 85 (2018) 201-208.
DOI URL |
| [57] |
Y. Chen, Z. Xu, C. Smith, J. Sankar, Acta Biomater. 10 (2014) 4561-4573.
DOI URL |
| [58] | J.G. Liu, B.C. Liu, S.Y. Min, B.Z. Yin, B. Peng, Z.S. Yu, C.M. Wang, X.L. Ma, P. Wen, Y. Tian, Y.F. Zheng, Bioact. Mater. 16 (2022) 301-319. |
| [59] |
Y.C. Wang, P.H. Fu, N.Q. Wang, L.M. Peng, B. Kang, H. Zeng, G.Y. Yuan, W.J. Ding, Engineering 6 (2020) 1267-1275.
DOI URL |
| [60] |
S. Castiglioni, A. Cazzaniga, W. Albisetti, J.A.M. Maier, Nutrients 5 (2013) 3022-3033.
DOI PMID |
| [61] | P. Gao, B. Fan, X. Yu, W. Liu, J. Wu, L. Shi, D. Yang, L. Tan, P. Wan, Y. Hao, S. Li, W. Hou, K. Yang, X. Li, Z. Guo, Bioact. Mater. 5 (2020) 680-693. |
| [62] |
C. Janning, E. Willbold, C. Vogt, J. Nellesen, A. Meyer-Lindenberg, H. Windhagen, F. Thorey, F. Witte, Acta Biomater. 6 (2010) 1861-1868.
DOI PMID |
| [63] |
M. Chagnon, L.G. Guy, N. Jackson, Toxicol. Pathol. 47 (2019) 390-400.
DOI URL |
| [64] |
C. Plaass, S. Ettinger, L. Sonnow, S. Koenneker, Y. Noll, A. Weizbauer, J. Reifenrath, L. Claassen, K. Daniilidis, C. Stukenborg-Colsman, H. Windhagen, J. Orthop. Res. 34 (2016) 2207-2214.
DOI URL |
| [65] |
M. Hamushan, W. Cai, Y. Zhang, Z. Ren, J. Du, S. Zhang, C. Zhao, P. Cheng, X. Zhang, H. Shen, P. Han, Bioact. Mater. 6 (2021) 1563-1574.
DOI PMID |
| [66] |
M.P. Staiger, A.M. Pietak, J. Huadmai, G. Dias, Biomaterials 27 (2006) 1728-1734.
DOI PMID |
| [67] |
Y.F. Zhang, J.K. Xu, Y.C. Ruan, M.K. Yu, M. O'Laughlin, H. Wise, D. Chen, L. Tian, D.F. Shi, J.L. Wang, S.H. Chen, J.Q. Feng, D.H.K. Chow, X.H. Xie, L.Z. Zheng, L. Huang, S. Huang, K. Leung, N. Lu, L. Zhao, H.F. Li, D.W. Zhao, X. Guo, K.M. Chan, F. Witte, H.C. Chan, Y.F. Zheng, L. Qin, Nat. Med. 22 (2016) 1160-1169.
DOI |
| [68] |
R. Liu, Z. Ma, S. Kunle Kolawole, L. Zeng, Y. Zhao, L. Ren, K. Yang, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 30 (2019) 75-92.
DOI |
| [69] |
Z. Du, X. Yu, B. Nie, Z. Zhu, M. Ibrahim, K. Yang, L. Tan, Y. Wang, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 107 (2019) 2388-2396.
DOI URL |
| [70] |
M.M. Belluci, T. Schoenmaker, C. Rossa, S.R. Orrico, T.J. de Vries, V. Everts, J. Nutr. Biochem. 24 (2013) 1488-1498.
DOI PMID |
| [71] |
Z.J. Zhai, X.H. Qu, H.W. Li, K. Yang, P. Wan, L.L. Tan, Z.X. Ouyang, X.Q. Liu, B. Tian, F. Xiao, W.G. Wang, C. Jiang, T.T. Tang, Q.M. Fan, A. Qin, K.R. Dai, Biomaterials 35 (2014) 6299-6310.
DOI URL |
| [72] |
X. Zhang, P. Huang, G. Jiang, M. Zhang, F. Yu, X. Dong, L. Wang, Y. Chen, W. Zhang, Y. Qi, W. Li, H. Zeng, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 121 (2021) 111868.
DOI URL |
| [73] |
M. Liu, R. Wang, J. Liu, W. Zhang, Z. Liu, X. Lou, H. Nie, H. Wang, X. Mo, A.I. Abd- Elhamid, R. Zheng, J. Wu, Biomater. Adv. 133 (2022) 112609.
DOI URL |
| [74] |
K. Dai, F. Zhao, W. Zhang, D. Chen, F. Hang, X. Zou, X. Chen, Biomed. Mater. 19 (2024) 065028.
DOI |
| [75] | S. Tan, Y. Wang, Y. Du, Y. Xiao, S. Zhang, Bioact. Mater. 6 (2021) 3411-3423. |
| [76] |
L. Chen, J. Zhu, N. Ge, Y. Liu, Z. Yan, G. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Wang, G. Wu, T. Qiu, H. Dai, J. Han, C. Guo, Biomaterials 318 (2025) 122992.
DOI URL |
| [77] |
Y. Yang, L. Liu, H. Luo, D. Zhang, S. Lei, K. Zhou, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5 (2019) 5368-5383.
DOI URL |
| [78] |
G. Hu, S. Zeng, T. Shao, Y. Li, Y. Han, J. Tu, J. Mao, Y. Xiao, L. Zhang, Biomater. Adv. 177 (2025) 214426.
DOI URL |
| [79] | N. Bai, C. Tan, Q. Li, Z. Xi, Biomed. Mater. Eng. 28 (2017) 339-345. |
| [80] |
X.N. Gu, W.R. Zhou, Y.F. Zheng, Y. Cheng, S.C. Wei, S.P. Zhong, T.F. Xi, L.J. Chen, Acta Biomater. 6 (2010) 4605-4613.
DOI PMID |
| [81] |
F. Witte, J. Fischer, J. Nellesen, H.A. Crostack, V. Kaese, A. Pisch, F. Beckmann, H. Windhagen, Biomaterials 27 (2006) 1013-1018.
DOI URL |
| [82] |
T. Kraus, S.F. Fischerauer, A.C. Hänzi, P.J. Uggowitzer, J.F. Löffler, A.M. Weinberg, Acta Biomater. 8 (2012) 1230-1238.
DOI URL |
| [83] | B.C. Liu, J.E. Liu, C.X. Wang, Z.G. Wang, S.Y. Min, C.M. Wang, Y.F. Zheng, P. Wen, Y. Tian, Bioact. Mater. 32 (2024) 177-189. |
| [84] | Z.Y. Ran, Y. Wang, J.X. Li, W.Y. Xu, J. Tan, B.J. Cao, D.H. Luo, Y.W. Ding, J.X. Wu, L. Wang, K. Xie, L. Deng, P.H. Fu, X.Y. Sun, L.Y. Shi, Y.Q. Hao, Int. J. Bioprint. 9 (2023) 401-417. |
| [85] |
J. Dong, Y. Li, P. Lin, M.A. Leeflang, S. van Asperen, K. Yu, N. Tümer, B. Norder, A.A. Zadpoor, J. Zhou, Acta Biomater. 114 (2020) 497-514.
DOI PMID |
| [86] | Y.H. Leem, K.S. Lee, J.H. Kim, H.K. Seok, J.S. Chang, D.H. Lee, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 10 (2016) E527-E536. |
| [87] |
C. Plaass, C. von Falck, S. Ettinger, L. Sonnow, F. Calderone, A. Weizbauer, J. Reifenrath, L. Claassen, H. Waizy, K. Daniilidis, C. Stukenborg-Colsman, H. Windhagen, J. Orthop. Sci. 23 (2018) 321-327.
DOI URL |
| [88] |
H. Windhagen, K. Radtke, A. Weizbauer, J. Diekmann, Y. Noll, U. Kreimeyer, R. Schavan, C. Stukenborg-Colsman, H. Waizy, Biomed. Eng. Online 12 (2013) 62-84.
DOI PMID |
| [89] | J.W. Lee, H.S. Han, K.J. Han, J. Park, H. Jeon, M.R. Ok, H.K. Seok, J.P. Ahn, K.E. Lee, D.H. Lee, S.J. Yang, S.Y. Cho, P.R. Cha, H. Kwon, T.H. Nam, J.H. Han, H.J. Rho, K.S. Lee, Y.C. Kim, D. Mantovani, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 (2016) 716-721. |
| [90] |
D. Zhao, S. Huang, F. Lu, B. Wang, L. Yang, L. Qin, K. Yang, Y. Li, W. Li, W. Wang, S. Tian, X. Zhang, W. Gao, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, X. Xie, J. Wang, J. Li, Biomaterials 81 (2016) 84-92.
DOI URL |
| [91] |
J. Sun, Z. Li, S. Liu, T. Xia, J. Shen, J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 18 (2023) 523-550.
DOI |
| [92] |
S. Könneker, K. Krockenberger, C. Pieh, C. von Falck, B. Brandewiede, P.M. Vogt, M.H. Kirschner, A. Ziegler, BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 20 (2019) 357-369.
DOI |
| [93] | Y.S. Li, F.T. Wang, Chembioeng. Rev. 11 (2024) 202400032. |
| [94] |
H. Wang, B.J. Zhao, C.K. Liu, C. Wang, X.Y. Tan, M. Hu, PLoS One 11 (2016) e0158513.
DOI URL |
| [95] | A. Popovich, V. Sufiiarov, E. Borisov, I. Polozov, Key Eng. Mater. 651-653 (2015) 677-682. |
| [96] |
J. Yang, C. Liu, H. Sun, Y. Liu, Z.G. Liu, D. Zhang, G. Zhao, Q. Wang, D.H. Yang, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 (2022) 1092916.
DOI URL |
| [97] |
J. Khalid, A.S. Stephen, S.C.F. Rawlinson, R.P. Allaker, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 113 (2025) e37991.
DOI URL |
| [98] |
L.J. Wang, X.H. Ni, F. Zhang, Z. Peng, F.X. Yu, L.B. Zhang, B. Li, Y. Jiao, Y.K. Li, B. Yang, X.Y. Zhu, Q.M. Zhao, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 16 (2021) 146.
DOI |
| [99] |
R. Li, S. Li, Y. Zhang, D. Jin, Z. Lin, X. Tao, T. Chen, L. Zheng, Z. Zhang, Q. Wu, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 (2023) 1223339.
DOI URL |
| [100] |
H.J. Lee, J.M. Kwak, C.R. Cha, S.K. Sidhu, S. Imazato, J.Y. Park, I.L. Yeo, J. Adv. Prosthodont. 17 (2025) 169-184.
DOI URL |
| [101] |
C.H. Lin, C.H. Chen, Y.S. Huang, C.H. Huang, J.C. Huang, J.S.C. Jang, Y.S. Lin, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 77 (2017) 308-317.
DOI URL |
| [102] |
Y. Lu, X. Xu, C. Yang, S. Hosseinkhani, C. Zhang, K. Luo, K. Tang, K. Yang, J. Lin, Biomater. Adv. 147 (2023) 213315.
DOI URL |
| [103] | Y. Lin, R.F. Brown, S.B. Jung, D.E. Day, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 102 (2014) 4491-4499. |
| [104] | F. Suska, L. Emanuelsson, A. Johansson, P. Tengvall, P. Thomsen, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 85 (2008) 888-896. |
| [105] |
Z.C. Lyu, Y.C. Zhao, S.C. Huo, F. Wang, X.C. Meng, Z.G. Yuan, T. Long, Y. Wang, Mater. Des. 222 (2022) 111069.
DOI URL |
| [106] |
Y. Wu, X. Shi, J. Wang, Y. Li, J. Wu, D. Jia, Y. Bai, X. Wu, Y. Xu, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 (2023) 1142264.
DOI URL |
| [107] | P. Mahmoudi, M.R. Akbarpour, H.B. Lakeh, F.J. Jing, M.R. Hadidi, B. Akhavan, Mater. Today Bio 17 (2022) 100447. |
| [108] |
Y.C. Xie, M. Lu, X.R. Mao, H.L. Yu, E.L. Zhang, Metals 12 (2022) 1726.
DOI URL |
| [109] |
H. Osman, F. Wang, G. Zou, D. Zhang, X. Bai, T. Jiang, Y. Wang, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 249 (2025) 114489.
DOI URL |
| [110] |
M. Li, Z. Ma, Y. Zhu, H. Xia, M.Y. Yao, X. Chu, X.L. Wang, K. Yang, M.Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, C.B. Mao, Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5 (2016) 557-566.
DOI URL |
| [111] |
W.R. Osório, A. Cremasco, P.N. Andrade, A. Garcia, R. Caram, Electrochim. Acta 55 (2010) 759-770.
DOI URL |
| [112] | D. Rabbitt, P.O. Kelly, V.M. Villapun, L.N. Carter, A.J. Knowles, S.C. Cox, Adv. Eng. Mater 14 (2025) 889-899. |
| [113] |
Y.D. Ma, J. Yan, T.T. Yan, Q. Wang, Z.F. Bao, Z. Yi, Front. Mater. 9 (2022) 999794.
DOI URL |
| [114] |
H.M. Mirabad, M.R. Akbarpour, F. Gazani, A.A. Chadegani, I. Khezri, A. Mirzamohammad, H. Damghani, O. Elahi, M.N. Khameneh, H.S. Kim, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 37 (2025) 3155-3181.
DOI URL |
| [115] |
G.M. Zeer, Y.I. Gordeev, E.G. Zelenkova, A.K. Abkaryan, E.V. Gerasimov, M.Y. Kuchinskii, S.M. Zharkov, Metals 14 (2024) 991.
DOI URL |
| [116] |
C.B. Yi, Z.Y. Ke, L. Zhang, J. Tan, Y.H. Jiang, Z.Y. He, Mater. Res. Express 7 (2020) 105404.
DOI |
| [117] |
D.Y. Zhang, D. Qiu, M.A. Gibson, Y.F. Zheng, H.L. Fraser, D.H. StJohn, M.A. Easton, Nature 582 (2020) E5-E5.
DOI |
| [118] |
Z. Ma, M. Li, R. Liu, L. Ren, Y. Zhang, H.B. Pan, Y. Zhao, K. Yang, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 27 (2016) 91.
DOI URL |
| [119] |
X. Zhang, H. Liu, L. Li, C. Huang, X. Meng, J. Liu, X. Bai, L. Ren, X. Wang, K. Yang, L. Qin, Regen. Biomater. 9 (2022) rbac011.
DOI URL |
| [120] |
S. Xu, Q. Wu, B. He, J. Rao, D.H.K. Chow, J. Xu, X. Wang, Y. Sun, C. Ning, K. Dai, Biomaterials 288 (2022) 121751.
DOI URL |
| [121] |
W. Liu, Q. Wang, H. Liu, S. He, H. Wang, C. Xu, B. Zhao, C. Jin, N. Li, S. Hu, Biomater. Adv. 177 (2025) 214388.
DOI URL |
| [122] |
S.Z. Jin, H. Yang, J. Yang, Z. Zhang, B. Guo, L.C. Zhang, Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 7 (2025) 065003.
DOI |
| [123] |
E. Marin, A. Lanzutti, Materials 17 (2024) 114.
DOI URL |
| [124] |
P. Qin, L.Y. Chen, C.H. Zhao, Y.J. Liu, C.D. Cao, H. Sun, L.C. Zhang, Corros. Sci. 189 (2021) 109609.
DOI URL |
| [125] | S.L. Sing, Int. J. Bioprint. 8 (2022) 1-8. |
| [126] |
Y.Q. Zhang, D.N. Sun, J. Cheng, J.K.H. Tsoi, J. Chen, Regener. Biomater. 7 (2020) 119-128.
DOI URL |
| [127] |
J.T. Liu, K. Wang, X.Y. Li, X.W. Zhang, X. Gong, Y.H. Zhu, Z.W. Ren, B. Zhang, J. Cheng, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 (2023) 1127929.
DOI URL |
| [128] |
B. Luo, L. Miu, Y.W. Luo, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 137 (2025) 3215-3227.
DOI |
| [129] |
E.M. Karakurt, Y. Huang, Y. Cetin, A. Incesu, H. Demirtas, M. Kaya, Y. Yildizhan, M. Tosun, G. Akbas, J. Funct. Biomater. 15 (2024) 253.
DOI URL |
| [130] |
A. Matsugaki, T. Matsuzaka, T. Nakano, Mater. Trans. 64 (2023) 25-30.
DOI URL |
| [131] |
L. Chézeau, A. Tchinda, G. Pierson, P. Bravetti, L. Ferrari, O. Joubert, M. Zaiou, B.H. Rihn, Biomedicines 10 (2022) 1898.
DOI URL |
| [132] |
D.G. Lee, X.J. Mi, T.K. Eom, Y. Lee, J. Biomater. Tissue Eng. 6 (2016) 798-801.
DOI URL |
| [133] | S. Schwab, R. Selin, M. Voron, T. Yanko, M. Khokhlov, Welding World (2025) 3321-3334. |
| [134] |
S.F. Jawed, C.D. Rabadia, Y.J. Liu, L.Q. Wang, P. Qin, Y.H. Li, X.H. Zhang, L.C. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 110 (2020) 110728.
DOI URL |
| [135] | L.M. Ulbrich, G.S. Balbinot, G.L. Brotto, V.C.B. Leitune, R.M.D. Soares, F.M. Collares, D. Ponzoni, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 16 (2022) 267-278. |
| [136] |
V.S. Challa, S. Mali, R.D. Misra, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 101 (2013) 2083-2089.
DOI PMID |
| [137] |
Y.J. Cheng, F.Y. Hung, J.R. Zhao, Materials 16 (2023) 7341.
DOI URL |
| [138] |
I. Limón, J. Bedmar, J.P. Fernández-Hernán, M. Multigner, B. Torres, J. Rams, S.C. Cifuentes, Materials 17 (2024) 6220.
DOI URL |
| [139] |
A.Q. Cai, H.R. Yin, C.C. Wang, Q. Chen, Y.X. Song, R.X. Yin, X. Yuan, H.R. Kang, H.W. Guo, Biomed. Mater. 18 (2023) 065011.
DOI |
| [140] |
B.L. Guo, P. Han, L.C. Guo, Y.Q. Cao, A.D. Li, J.Z. Kong, H.F. Zhai, D. Wu, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 10 (2015) 336.
DOI URL |
| [141] |
Y.Y. Chang, H.L. Huang, H.J. Chen, C.H. Lai, C.Y. Wen, Surf. Coat. Technol. 259 (2014) 193-198.
DOI URL |
| [1] | Jiaming Wei, Jiarui Xue, Ke Zhao, Xunlu Yin, Kai Sun, Penghui Li, Chong Liu, Haojie Wang, Jiawen Zhan, Kexin Yang. OGP-loaded tannic acid-stabilized gold nanoparticles mitigates bone and muscle degeneration in osteosarcopenia [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 41(3): 109-121. |
| [2] | X.L. Wang, J.Y. Li, Q.S. Mei. Recent progress in Zn matrix composites for biomedical applications [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 26-37. |
| [3] | Zhizhi Wang, Pei Liu, Jingyi Guo, Yiwen Yan, Aiqin Wang, Jingpei Xie. Excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility of Ti-15Mo alloy via interstitial nitrogen atoms [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 38-46. |
| [4] | Eman Hassna, Yuxin Huang, Tingting Yan. Biodegradable metals for cardiovascular and orthopaedic implants: A comparative review of magnesium, iron and zinc [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 68-82. |
| [5] | Cheng Ren, Xiaohua Min, Sujie Zhang, Weiqiang Wang. Springback Behavior and Biocompatibility in β-Type Ti-Mo-O Alloys [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(2): 313-326. |
| [6] | Ruoyu Di, Yonghua Sun, Runhua Yao, Sen Pei, Xiaohong Yao, Ruiqiang Hang. Preparation of TiO2 Nano-Flower Coating on Ti Substrates with Good Physical Sterilization Effect and Biocompatibility [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(9): 1581-1589. |
| [7] | J. Sharath Kumar, Rakesh Kumar, Rajeev Verma. Surface Modification Aspects for Improving Biomedical Properties in Implants: A Review [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(2): 213-241. |
| [8] | Zenglong Yan, Shuyuan Zhang, Ling Ren, Xizhuang Bai, Ke Yang, Xiang Wei. Anodic Etching Surface Treatment and Antibacterial Properties of Ti-Cu [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(10): 1767-1776. |
| [9] | Xuan Luo, Chao Yang, Dongdong Li, Lai-Chang Zhang. Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Beta-Type Titanium Alloys for Biomedical Application: A Review [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(1): 17-28. |
| [10] | Minghui Zhou, Hui Sun, Yanming Gan, Cheng Ji, Yan Chen, Yanjin Lu, Jinxin Lin, Qiang Wang. Tuning the Corrosion Resistance, Antibacterial Activity, and Cytocompatibility by Constructing Grooves on the Surface of Ti6Al4V3Cu Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(12): 1979-1998. |
| [11] | Sujie Zhang, Xiaohua Min, Yada Li, Weiqiang Wang, Ping Li, Mingjia Li. Effects of Deformation and Phase Transformation Microstructures on Springback Behavior and Biocompatibility in β-Type Ti-15Mo Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2022, 35(4): 621-635. |
| [12] | Ji Zhang, Ling Ren, Ke Yang. Cytotoxicity of Ti-6Al-4V-5Cu Alloy to MC3T3-E1 Cells [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2021, 34(5): 694-700. |
| [13] | Ruo-Yu Liu, Ran-Gan He, Yan-Xia Chen, Sheng-Feng Guo. Effect of Ag on the Microstructure, Mechanical and Bio-corrosion Properties of Fe-30Mn Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2019, 32(11): 1337-1345. |
| [14] | Feng-Xiang Qin,Yang Zhou,Chuan Ji,Zhen-Hua Dan,Guo-Qiang Xie,Sen Yang. Enhanced Mechanical Properties, Corrosion Behavior and Bioactivity of Ti-based Bulk Metallic Glasses with Minor Addition Elements [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2016, 29(11): 1011-1018. |
| [15] | Hemalatha Thiagarajan, Krithiga Gunasekaran, Santhosh Kumar Baskar, P. Sastry Thotapalli. Preparation and Characterization of Hydroxyapatite-Coated Selenium Nanoparticles and their Interaction with Osteosarcoma (SaOS-2) Cells [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2014, 27(6): 1152-1158. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
WeChat
