Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2015, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 772-780.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-015-0260-6
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Bo-Lin Tang1,2, Guo-Hua Jiang1,2,3(
), Wen-Xing Chen1,2,3, Jun-Min Wan1,2
Received:2014-12-02
Revised:2014-12-28
Online:2015-03-22
Published:2015-07-23
Bo-Lin Tang, Guo-Hua Jiang, Wen-Xing Chen, Jun-Min Wan. First-Principles Study on Hexagonal WO3 for HCHO Gas Sensing Application[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2015, 28(6): 772-780.
| Method | a (10-1 nm) | c (10-1 nm) | c/a | u | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFT-GGA-PBE | 7.4169 | 3.8104 | 0.5137 | 0.5000 | This work |
| DFT-GGA-PBE | 7.410 | 3.808 | 0.514 | 0.500 | [ |
| DFT-GGA | 7.410 | 3.814 | 0.515 | [ | |
| Experimental | 7.298 | 3.899 | 0.534 | 0.500 | [ |
Table 1 Calculated and experimental values of the lattice parameters of h-WO3
| Method | a (10-1 nm) | c (10-1 nm) | c/a | u | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFT-GGA-PBE | 7.4169 | 3.8104 | 0.5137 | 0.5000 | This work |
| DFT-GGA-PBE | 7.410 | 3.808 | 0.514 | 0.500 | [ |
| DFT-GGA | 7.410 | 3.814 | 0.515 | [ | |
| Experimental | 7.298 | 3.899 | 0.534 | 0.500 | [ |
Fig. 2 Crystal structure of h-WO3 a, clean WO-terminated h-WO3 (001) surface after optimizing b, and optimized adsorption structures of HCHO on W5 (HCHO-W5 configuration) c, O7 (HCOH-O7 configuration) d site of WO-terminated h-WO3 (001) surface, respectively
| Configuration | Bond angle (°) | Bond length/atomic distance (Å) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O-C-H1 | O-C-H2 | H1-C-H2 | C=O | C-H1 | C-H2 | ||
| HCHO | 121.889 | 121.889 | 116.223 | 1.219 | 1.116 | 1.116 | |
| HCHO-W5 | 121.369 | 121.365 | 117.266 | 1.221 | 1.110 | 1.111 | O-W5 (2.474) |
| HCOH-O7 | 121.175 | 119.879 | 118.942 | 1.234 | 1.103 | 1.113 | H1-O7 (2.356) |
| HCOH-O16 | 110.039 | 126.835 | 116.347 | 1.207 | 2.024 | 1.098 | H1-O16 (0.986) |
Table 2 The bond angle and bond length or atomic distance for optimized free HCHO molecule and three HCHO-adsorbed configurations
| Configuration | Bond angle (°) | Bond length/atomic distance (Å) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O-C-H1 | O-C-H2 | H1-C-H2 | C=O | C-H1 | C-H2 | ||
| HCHO | 121.889 | 121.889 | 116.223 | 1.219 | 1.116 | 1.116 | |
| HCHO-W5 | 121.369 | 121.365 | 117.266 | 1.221 | 1.110 | 1.111 | O-W5 (2.474) |
| HCOH-O7 | 121.175 | 119.879 | 118.942 | 1.234 | 1.103 | 1.113 | H1-O7 (2.356) |
| HCOH-O16 | 110.039 | 126.835 | 116.347 | 1.207 | 2.024 | 1.098 | H1-O16 (0.986) |
Fig. 3 Total density of the states of HCHO-W5 a and HCOH-O7 b configurations; PDOSs of C and O atoms of HCHO molecule for HCHO-W5 c, HCOH-O7 d configurations
| Atom | Before adsorption | After adsorption | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | |
| O | 1.84 | 4.64 | 6.48 | -0.48 | 1.78 | 4.65 | 6.43 | -0.43 | ||
| C | 1.26 | 2.80 | 4.06 | -0.06 | 1.28 | 2.80 | 4.08 | -0.08 | ||
| H1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.33 | ||||
| H2 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.33 | ||||
| W5 | 2.32 | 6.26 | 3.64 | 12.22 | 1.78 | 2.34 | 6.31 | 3.66 | 12.31 | 1.69 |
Table 3 The Mulliken population analysis for HCHO-W5 configuration before and after HCHO adsorption
| Atom | Before adsorption | After adsorption | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | |
| O | 1.84 | 4.64 | 6.48 | -0.48 | 1.78 | 4.65 | 6.43 | -0.43 | ||
| C | 1.26 | 2.80 | 4.06 | -0.06 | 1.28 | 2.80 | 4.08 | -0.08 | ||
| H1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.33 | ||||
| H2 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.33 | ||||
| W5 | 2.32 | 6.26 | 3.64 | 12.22 | 1.78 | 2.34 | 6.31 | 3.66 | 12.31 | 1.69 |
| Atom | Before adsorption | After adsorption | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | |
| O | 1.84 | 4.64 | 6.48 | -0.48 | 1.82 | 4.59 | 6.41 | -0.41 | ||
| C | 1.26 | 2.80 | 4.06 | -0.06 | 1.28 | 2.79 | 4.07 | -0.07 | ||
| H1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.25 | ||||
| H2 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.35 | ||||
| O7 | 1.86 | 4.83 | 6.69 | -0.69 | 1.85 | 4.84 | 6.69 | -0.69 | ||
Table 4 The Mulliken population analysis for HCOH-O7 configuration before and after HCHO adsorption
| Atom | Before adsorption | After adsorption | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | |
| O | 1.84 | 4.64 | 6.48 | -0.48 | 1.82 | 4.59 | 6.41 | -0.41 | ||
| C | 1.26 | 2.80 | 4.06 | -0.06 | 1.28 | 2.79 | 4.07 | -0.07 | ||
| H1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.25 | ||||
| H2 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.35 | ||||
| O7 | 1.86 | 4.83 | 6.69 | -0.69 | 1.85 | 4.84 | 6.69 | -0.69 | ||
Fig. 5 Clean O-terminated h-WO3 (001) surface a; optimized adsorption structures of HCHO on O16 (HCOH-O16 configuration) b; magnified image as marked with black ellipse in b image c; optimized structure for HCOOH molecule d
Fig. 6 Total density of states of HCOH-O16 configurations a; PDOSs of C and O16 atoms after adsorption b; PDOSs of O16 and W5 atoms before and after adsorption c; PDOSs of C and H1 atoms before and after adsorption d
| Atom | Before adsorption | After adsorption | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | |
| O | 1.84 | 4.64 | 6.48 | -0.48 | 1.85 | 4.74 | 6.59 | -0.59 | ||
| C | 1.26 | 2.80 | 4.06 | -0.06 | 1.08 | 2.55 | 3.63 | 0.38 | ||
| H1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
| H2 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.36 | ||||
| O16 | 1.86 | 4.83 | 6.69 | -0.69 | 1.83 | 4.83 | 6.66 | -0.66 | ||
Table 5 The Mulliken population analysis for HCOH-O16 configuration before and after HCHO adsorption
| Atom | Before adsorption | After adsorption | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | s | p | d | Total | Charge (e) | |
| O | 1.84 | 4.64 | 6.48 | -0.48 | 1.85 | 4.74 | 6.59 | -0.59 | ||
| C | 1.26 | 2.80 | 4.06 | -0.06 | 1.08 | 2.55 | 3.63 | 0.38 | ||
| H1 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
| H2 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.36 | ||||
| O16 | 1.86 | 4.83 | 6.69 | -0.69 | 1.83 | 4.83 | 6.66 | -0.66 | ||
| [1] | Y. Suzuki, N. Nakano, K. Suzuki,Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 5695(2003) |
| [2] | Z. Wang, J. Liu, F. Wang, S. Chen, H. Luo, X. Yu, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 13577 (2010) |
| [3] | B. Geng, C. Fang, F. Zhan, N. Yu, Small 4, 1337 (2008) |
| [4] | M. Epifani, E. Comini, R. Díaz, J. Arbiol, P. Siciliano, G. Sberveglieri, J. Morante, Sens. Actuators B 118, 105 (2006) |
| [5] | G. Korotcenkov, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 139, 1 (2007) |
| [6] | M. Ippommatsu, H. Ohnishi, H. Sasaki, T. Matsumoto, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 8368(1991) |
| [7] | L. Deng, X. Ding, D. Zeng, S. Tian, H. Li, C. Xie, Sens. Actuators B 163, 260 (2012) |
| [8] | M. Law, H. Kind, B. Messer, F. Kim, P. Yang,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 114, 2511(2002) |
| [9] | E. Comini, G. Faglia, G. Sberveglieri, Z. Pan, Z. Wang,Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1869(2002) |
| [10] | Y. Wang, X. Jiang, Y. Xia, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 16176(2003) |
| [11] | Y. Qin, X. Li, F. Wang, M. Hu, J. Alloys Compd. 509, 8401(2011) |
| [12] | D. Hua, M. Liu, Y. Qin, J. Alloys Compd. 587, 227(2014) |
| [13] | M. Ahsana, T. Tesfamichaela, M. Ionescub, J. Bella, N. Mottaa, Sens. Actuators B 162, 14 (2012) |
| [14] | C. MateiGhimbeu, M. Lumbreras, M. Siadat, J. Schoonman,Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 13, 1(2010) |
| [15] | J. Wang, P. Zhang, J. Qi, P. Yao, Actuators B 136, 399 (2009) |
| [16] | S. Pokhrel, C. Simion, V. Teodorescu, N. Barsan, U. Weimar,Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1767(2009) |
| [17] | Y. Xu, Z. Tang, Z. Zhang, Y. Ji, Z. Zhou,Sens. Lett. 6, 938(2008) |
| [18] | I. Szilágyi, S. Saukko, J. Mizsei, P. Király, G. Tárkányi, A. Tóth, A. Szabó, K. Varga-Josepovits, J. Madarász, G. Pokol, Mater. Sci. Forum 589, 161 (2008) |
| [19] | I. Szilágyia, L. Wang, P. Gouma, C. Balázsi, J. Madarász, G. Pokold,Mater. Res. Bull. 44, 505(2009) |
| [20] | C. Wang, F. Wang, X. Fu, E. Zhang, Z. Xu, Chin. Phys. B 20, 210 (2011) |
| [21] | L. Zhao, F. Tian, X. Wang, W. Zhao, A. Fu, Y. Shen, S. Chen, S. Yu,Comput. Mater. Sci. 79, 691(2013) |
| [22] | Z. Zhao, X. He, J. Yi, C. Ma, Y. Cao, J. Qiu,RSC Adv. 3, 84(2013) |
| [23] | B. Sun, W. Chen, J. Zheng, C. Lu,Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 3141(2008) |
| [24] | J. Scaranto, S. Giorgianni,Mol. Phys. 106, 2425(2008) |
| [25] | X. Wang, F. Tian, W. Zhao, A. Fu, L. Zhao,Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 218(2013) |
| [26] | B. Ingham, S. Hendy, S. Chong, J. Tallon, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075109 (2005) |
| [27] | B. Gerand, G. Novogorocki, J. Guenot, M. Figlarz, J. Solid, State Chem. 29, 429(1979) |
| [28] | A. Kaushal, D. Kaur, J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 2485(2011) |
| [29] | C. Filippi, D. Singh, C. Umrigar, Phys. Rev. B 50, 14947 (1994) |
| [30] | C. Lambert-Mauriat, V. Oison, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18, 7361 (2006) |
| [31] | Y. Shi, M. Wang, C. Hong, Z. Yang, J. Deng, X. Song, L. Wang, J. Shao, H. Liu, Y. Ding, Sens. Actuators B 177, 1027 (2013) |
| [32] | Y. Xue, Z. Tang, Sens. Actuators B 138, 108 (2009) |
| [1] | Shang Zhao, Zhaolin Wang, Mingliang Wang, Zeyu Ding, Yiping Lu. A critical review of advances and application prospects of soft magnetic high entropy alloys [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 1-7. |
| [2] | Wei-Peng Chen, Jia-Qi Pei, Hua Hou, Yu-Hong Zhao. Phase-field simulation of α-Mg dendrite growth in magnesium alloys: A review [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 48-61. |
| [3] | Zhi-Gang Qi, Qi Chen, Zhao-Xuan Wang, Zi-Wei Guo, Zi-Qi Song, Yan-Xu Li, Xin-Long Lu, Mehran-Khan Alam, Su-Juan Cheng, Bo-Xuan Cao, Xi-Hua Zhang, Wei-Min Wang. Achieving integrated soft magnetic-catalytic functionalities in Fe-based amorphous ribbons via glassy matrix and self-spalling oxide layer [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 88-100. |
| [4] | Peng Liu, Hongliang Liu, Jun Liu, Chaoyun Yang, Hang Liu, Chengwu Zheng, Yikun Luan, Mingguang Li, Dianzhong Li. Manipulating the texture configuration and formability of interstitial-free steels through low-oxygen rare earth addition [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 101-109. |
| [5] | Peng Han, Wen Wang, Jun Cai, Jia Lin, Hubin Yang, Qianzhi Ma, Feng Gao, Ke Qiao, Fengming Qiang, Kuaishe Wang. Excellent superplasticity for lamellar microstructure in nugget of a double-sided friction stir welded Ti-4.5Al-3V-2Mo-2Fe alloy joint [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 110-123. |
| [6] | Lei Qin, Shengfeng Zhou, Jianbo Jin, Huan Yang, Kunmao Li, Cheng Deng, Yujie Yuan, Seyed Reza Elmi Hosseini, Lai-Chang Zhang. Effect of molybdenum content on the microstructure and tribological properties of Ti-Nb-Cu alloys produced by LPBF additive manufacturing [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 13-25. |
| [7] | X.L. Wang, J.Y. Li, Q.S. Mei. Recent progress in Zn matrix composites for biomedical applications [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 26-37. |
| [8] | Kunmao Li, Shengfeng Zhou, Jing Liu, Feng Yang, Chengliang Yang. A review on the biomedical Ti-Cu alloys: Design, preparation, microstructure and properties [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 47-67. |
| [9] | B. M. Shi, Y. T. Pang, B. H. Shan, B. B. Wang, Y. Liu, P. Xue, J. F. Zhang, Y. N. Zan, Q. Z. Wang, B. L. Xiao, Z. Y. Ma. Microstructure Evolution and Fracture Behavior of (B4C+Al2O3)/Al Friction Stir Welded Joints [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1513-1526. |
| [10] | Shudong Yang, Xiaoqian Guo, Chao Ma, Lu Shen, Lingyu Zhao, Wei Zhu. Anisotropic Mechanical Behavior in an Extruded AZ31 Magnesium Alloy: Experimental and Crystal Plasticity Modeling [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1527-1544. |
| [11] | H. Q. Dai, N. Li, L. H. Wu, J. Wang, P. Xue, F. C. Liu, D. R. Ni, B. L. Xiao, Z. Y. Ma. Low-Temperature Superplastic Deformation Behavior of Bimodal Microstructure of Friction Stir Processed Ti-6Al-4V Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1559-1569. |
| [12] | Shuyi Ren, Jiao Li, Kai Wu, Xiaoge Li, Yaqiang Wang, Jinyu Zhang, Gang Liu, Jun Sun. Thermal Stability and Mechanical Properties of Nanotwinned Ni-W Alloyed Films [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1570-1582. |
| [13] | Xinhao Li, Jieli Ma, Yiren Wang, Yong Jiang. A Novel Nano-Structured Die Steel with High Strength and High Thermal Stability [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1591-1603. |
| [14] | Yutao Wang, Liming Fu, Shuo Ma, Wei Wang, Aidang Shan. A 2.6 GPa Ultra-Strong Steel with Ultrafine Lamellar Structure Produced by Heavy Warm Rolling [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1613-1627. |
| [15] | Jiayu Wang, Ke Liu, Zhao Lei, Xing Li, Li Liu, Sujun Wu. Machine-Learning-Assisted Phase Prediction in High-Entropy Alloys Using Two-Step Feature Selection Strategy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1261-1274. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
WeChat
