Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2014, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 995-1007.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-014-0113-8
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
P.M.Ajith1, P.Sathiya1(
), S.Aravindan2
Received:2014-07-26
Revised:2014-07-26
Online:2014-07-26
Published:2015-07-23
P.M.Ajith, P.Sathiya, S.Aravindan. Experimental Investigation on Friction Welding of UNS S32205 Duplex Stainless Steel[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2014, 27(6): 995-1007.
| C | Si | Mn | P | S | Cr | Mo | Ni | N | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.021 | 0.357 | 1.61 | 0.026 | 0.001 | 22.50 | 3.38 | 4.79 | 0.193 | Rest |
Table 1 Base material chemical composition (wt%)
| C | Si | Mn | P | S | Cr | Mo | Ni | N | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.021 | 0.357 | 1.61 | 0.026 | 0.001 | 22.50 | 3.38 | 4.79 | 0.193 | Rest |
| Exp. No. | HP (MPa) | UP (MPa) | HT (s) | UT (s) | SoR (r/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | 145 | 6 | 3 | 1,500 |
| 2 | 70 | 155 | 7 | 4 | 2,000 |
| 3 | 70 | 165 | 8 | 5 | 2,500 |
| 4 | 70 | 175 | 9 | 6 | 3,000 |
| 5 | 80 | 145 | 7 | 5 | 3,000 |
| 6 | 80 | 155 | 6 | 6 | 2,500 |
| 7 | 80 | 165 | 9 | 3 | 2,000 |
| 8 | 80 | 175 | 8 | 4 | 1,500 |
| 9 | 90 | 145 | 8 | 6 | 2,000 |
| 10 | 90 | 155 | 9 | 5 | 1,500 |
| 11 | 90 | 165 | 6 | 4 | 3,000 |
| 12 | 90 | 175 | 7 | 3 | 2,500 |
| 13 | 100 | 145 | 9 | 4 | 2,500 |
| 14 | 100 | 155 | 8 | 3 | 3,000 |
| 15 | 100 | 165 | 7 | 6 | 1,500 |
| 16 | 100 | 175 | 6 | 5 | 2,000 |
Table 2 List of friction welding parameters used in the preparation of weldment
| Exp. No. | HP (MPa) | UP (MPa) | HT (s) | UT (s) | SoR (r/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | 145 | 6 | 3 | 1,500 |
| 2 | 70 | 155 | 7 | 4 | 2,000 |
| 3 | 70 | 165 | 8 | 5 | 2,500 |
| 4 | 70 | 175 | 9 | 6 | 3,000 |
| 5 | 80 | 145 | 7 | 5 | 3,000 |
| 6 | 80 | 155 | 6 | 6 | 2,500 |
| 7 | 80 | 165 | 9 | 3 | 2,000 |
| 8 | 80 | 175 | 8 | 4 | 1,500 |
| 9 | 90 | 145 | 8 | 6 | 2,000 |
| 10 | 90 | 155 | 9 | 5 | 1,500 |
| 11 | 90 | 165 | 6 | 4 | 3,000 |
| 12 | 90 | 175 | 7 | 3 | 2,500 |
| 13 | 100 | 145 | 9 | 4 | 2,500 |
| 14 | 100 | 155 | 8 | 3 | 3,000 |
| 15 | 100 | 165 | 7 | 6 | 1,500 |
| 16 | 100 | 175 | 6 | 5 | 2,000 |
Fig. 1 Macrographs of the friction weld joints: a Exp. No. 1, b Exp. No. 2, c Exp. No. 3, d Exp. No. 4, e Exp. No. 5, f Exp. No. 6, g Exp. No. 7, h Exp. No. 8, i Exp. No. 9, j Exp. No. 10, k Exp. No. 11, l Exp. No. 12, m Exp. No. 13, n Exp. No. 14, o Exp. No. 15, p Exp. No. 16
| Exp. No. | Ferrite number | Predicted ferrite number in the weld metal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM | PDZ | Base metal | ||
| 1 | 53.34 | 47.18 | 51.98 | 48 |
| 2 | 54.5 | 46.52 | 50.04 | 46 |
| 3 | 51.88 | 45.14 | 48.26 | 47 |
| 4 | 53.62 | 45.28 | 43.66 | 46 |
| 5 | 55.76 | 45.32 | 47.78 | 45 |
| 6 | 52.9 | 46.8 | 50.7 | 48 |
| 7 | 52.3 | 43.8 | 48.1 | 47 |
| 8 | 55.02 | 44.5 | 44.78 | 46 |
| 9 | 51.86 | 44.46 | 47.7 | 46 |
| 10 | 55.96 | 44.3 | 47.62 | 47 |
| 11 | 52.1 | 46.6 | 49.1 | 45 |
| 12 | 52.0 | 45.38 | 46.34 | 46 |
| 13 | 52.78 | 41.28 | 44.16 | 46 |
| 14 | 55.0 | 45.06 | 45.1 | 45 |
| 15 | 54.68 | 45.68 | 48.46 | 47 |
| 16 | 53.46 | 46.24 | 45.8 | 46 |
Table 3 Measured and predicted ferrite number friction weld zones
| Exp. No. | Ferrite number | Predicted ferrite number in the weld metal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM | PDZ | Base metal | ||
| 1 | 53.34 | 47.18 | 51.98 | 48 |
| 2 | 54.5 | 46.52 | 50.04 | 46 |
| 3 | 51.88 | 45.14 | 48.26 | 47 |
| 4 | 53.62 | 45.28 | 43.66 | 46 |
| 5 | 55.76 | 45.32 | 47.78 | 45 |
| 6 | 52.9 | 46.8 | 50.7 | 48 |
| 7 | 52.3 | 43.8 | 48.1 | 47 |
| 8 | 55.02 | 44.5 | 44.78 | 46 |
| 9 | 51.86 | 44.46 | 47.7 | 46 |
| 10 | 55.96 | 44.3 | 47.62 | 47 |
| 11 | 52.1 | 46.6 | 49.1 | 45 |
| 12 | 52.0 | 45.38 | 46.34 | 46 |
| 13 | 52.78 | 41.28 | 44.16 | 46 |
| 14 | 55.0 | 45.06 | 45.1 | 45 |
| 15 | 54.68 | 45.68 | 48.46 | 47 |
| 16 | 53.46 | 46.24 | 45.8 | 46 |
| Exp. No. | Cr | Mo | Si | Ni | C | N | Mn | Creq | Nieq | Creq/Nieq |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.60 | 3.31 | 0.38 | 5.02 | 0.012 | 0.142 | 1.54 | 22.814 | 12.092 | 1.88 |
| 2 | 22.91 | 3.42 | 0.37 | 4.98 | 0.023 | 0.173 | 1.63 | 23.263 | 13.233 | 1.76 |
| 3 | 22.16 | 3.27 | 0.42 | 5.12 | 0.019 | 0.145 | 1.73 | 22.378 | 12.575 | 1.78 |
| 4 | 22.38 | 3.41 | 0.48 | 4.83 | 0.024 | 0.153 | 1.69 | 22.884 | 12.623 | 1.81 |
| 5 | 22.54 | 3.29 | 0.39 | 5.10 | 0.018 | 0.162 | 1.85 | 22.741 | 13.027 | 1.74 |
| 6 | 22.61 | 3.17 | 0.41 | 5.09 | 0.021 | 0.155 | 1.73 | 22.673 | 12.865 | 1.76 |
| 7 | 22.76 | 3.28 | 0.44 | 4.89 | 0.025 | 0.149 | 1.51 | 23.022 | 12.519 | 1.84 |
| 8 | 22.09 | 3.46 | 0.47 | 5.01 | 0.027 | 0.163 | 1.49 | 22.649 | 13.053 | 1.73 |
| 9 | 22.81 | 3.39 | 0.39 | 5.07 | 0.019 | 0.168 | 1.53 | 23.151 | 13.023 | 1.78 |
| 10 | 22.85 | 3.26 | 0.31 | 4.92 | 0.025 | 0.149 | 1.60 | 22.889 | 12.594 | 1.82 |
| 11 | 22.91 | 3.20 | 0.43 | 4.87 | 0.023 | 0.171 | 1.67 | 23.045 | 13.091 | 1.76 |
| 12 | 22.11 | 3.38 | 0.44 | 5.05 | 0.028 | 0.153 | 1.59 | 22.512 | 12.913 | 1.74 |
| 13 | 22.73 | 3.39 | 0.47 | 5.11 | 0.022 | 0.156 | 1.43 | 23.191 | 12.791 | 1.81 |
| 14 | 22.39 | 3.18 | 0.34 | 4.92 | 0.019 | 0.171 | 1.72 | 22.362 | 13.046 | 1.71 |
| 15 | 22.43 | 3.40 | 0.36 | 4.79 | 0.024 | 0.162 | 1.63 | 22.74 | 12.787 | 1.78 |
| 16 | 22.75 | 3.29 | 0.41 | 4.86 | 0.021 | 0.166 | 1.58 | 22.72 | 12.78 | 1.77 |
| Base metal | 22.43 | 3.38 | 0.35 | 4.77 | 0.025 | 0.193 | 1.61 | 22.69 | 13.59 | 1.66 |
Table 4 Chemical composition (wt%) of weld metal and Creq/Nieq ratios
| Exp. No. | Cr | Mo | Si | Ni | C | N | Mn | Creq | Nieq | Creq/Nieq |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.60 | 3.31 | 0.38 | 5.02 | 0.012 | 0.142 | 1.54 | 22.814 | 12.092 | 1.88 |
| 2 | 22.91 | 3.42 | 0.37 | 4.98 | 0.023 | 0.173 | 1.63 | 23.263 | 13.233 | 1.76 |
| 3 | 22.16 | 3.27 | 0.42 | 5.12 | 0.019 | 0.145 | 1.73 | 22.378 | 12.575 | 1.78 |
| 4 | 22.38 | 3.41 | 0.48 | 4.83 | 0.024 | 0.153 | 1.69 | 22.884 | 12.623 | 1.81 |
| 5 | 22.54 | 3.29 | 0.39 | 5.10 | 0.018 | 0.162 | 1.85 | 22.741 | 13.027 | 1.74 |
| 6 | 22.61 | 3.17 | 0.41 | 5.09 | 0.021 | 0.155 | 1.73 | 22.673 | 12.865 | 1.76 |
| 7 | 22.76 | 3.28 | 0.44 | 4.89 | 0.025 | 0.149 | 1.51 | 23.022 | 12.519 | 1.84 |
| 8 | 22.09 | 3.46 | 0.47 | 5.01 | 0.027 | 0.163 | 1.49 | 22.649 | 13.053 | 1.73 |
| 9 | 22.81 | 3.39 | 0.39 | 5.07 | 0.019 | 0.168 | 1.53 | 23.151 | 13.023 | 1.78 |
| 10 | 22.85 | 3.26 | 0.31 | 4.92 | 0.025 | 0.149 | 1.60 | 22.889 | 12.594 | 1.82 |
| 11 | 22.91 | 3.20 | 0.43 | 4.87 | 0.023 | 0.171 | 1.67 | 23.045 | 13.091 | 1.76 |
| 12 | 22.11 | 3.38 | 0.44 | 5.05 | 0.028 | 0.153 | 1.59 | 22.512 | 12.913 | 1.74 |
| 13 | 22.73 | 3.39 | 0.47 | 5.11 | 0.022 | 0.156 | 1.43 | 23.191 | 12.791 | 1.81 |
| 14 | 22.39 | 3.18 | 0.34 | 4.92 | 0.019 | 0.171 | 1.72 | 22.362 | 13.046 | 1.71 |
| 15 | 22.43 | 3.40 | 0.36 | 4.79 | 0.024 | 0.162 | 1.63 | 22.74 | 12.787 | 1.78 |
| 16 | 22.75 | 3.29 | 0.41 | 4.86 | 0.021 | 0.166 | 1.58 | 22.72 | 12.78 | 1.77 |
| Base metal | 22.43 | 3.38 | 0.35 | 4.77 | 0.025 | 0.193 | 1.61 | 22.69 | 13.59 | 1.66 |
Fig. 4 PDZ and weld zone microstructures: a Exp. No. 1 PDZ, b Exp. No. 1 WM, c Exp. No. 2 PDZ, d Exp. No. 2 WM, e Exp. No. 5 PDZ, f Exp. No. 5 WM, g Exp. No. 7 PDZ, h Exp. No. 7 WM, i Exp. No. 10 PDZ, j Exp. No. 10 WM, k Exp. No. 12 PDZ, l Exp. No. 12 WM, m Exp. No. 13PDZ, n Exp. No. 13 WM, o Exp. No. 14 PDZ, p Exp. No. 14 WM, q Exp. No. 16 PDZ, r Exp. No. 16 WM
| Exp. No. | WM | PDZ | Exp. No. | WM | PDZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.8 | 10.04 | 9 | 18.4 | 9.0 |
| 2 | 27.5 | 16.01 | 10 | 19.1 | 8.27 |
| 3 | 26.2 | 10.4 | 11 | 25.92 | 9.48 |
| 4 | 20.97 | 12.8 | 12 | 25.25 | 9.53 |
| 5 | 14.2 | 11.0 | 13 | 23.3 | 9.07 |
| 6 | 12.8 | 11.4 | 14 | 25.3 | 9.45 |
| 7 | 24.7 | 9.95 | 15 | 20.54 | 11.27 |
| 8 | 14.2 | 7.85 | 16 | 21.45 | 10.21 |
| Average | 21.85 | 10.35 |
Table 5 Measured grain size values (µm)
| Exp. No. | WM | PDZ | Exp. No. | WM | PDZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.8 | 10.04 | 9 | 18.4 | 9.0 |
| 2 | 27.5 | 16.01 | 10 | 19.1 | 8.27 |
| 3 | 26.2 | 10.4 | 11 | 25.92 | 9.48 |
| 4 | 20.97 | 12.8 | 12 | 25.25 | 9.53 |
| 5 | 14.2 | 11.0 | 13 | 23.3 | 9.07 |
| 6 | 12.8 | 11.4 | 14 | 25.3 | 9.45 |
| 7 | 24.7 | 9.95 | 15 | 20.54 | 11.27 |
| 8 | 14.2 | 7.85 | 16 | 21.45 | 10.21 |
| Average | 21.85 | 10.35 |
| Exp. No. | HP (MPa) | UP (MPa) | HT (s) | UT (s) | SoR (r/min) | Ultimate tensile strength (MPa) | Yield strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Fracture location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | 145 | 6 | 3 | 1,500 | 752 | 502 | 26.3 | Base |
| 2 | 70 | 155 | 7 | 4 | 2,000 | 766 | 508 | 27.2 | Base |
| 3 | 70 | 165 | 8 | 5 | 2,500 | 781 | 517 | 28.4 | Base |
| 4 | 70 | 175 | 9 | 6 | 3,000 | 805 | 516 | 31.1 | Base |
| 5 | 80 | 145 | 7 | 5 | 3,000 | 822 | 520 | 34.1 | Base |
| 6 | 80 | 155 | 6 | 6 | 2,500 | 758 | 508 | 26.7 | Base |
| 7 | 80 | 165 | 9 | 3 | 2,000 | 762 | 507 | 26.8 | Base |
| 8 | 80 | 175 | 8 | 4 | 1,500 | 785 | 516 | 29.2 | Base |
| 9 | 90 | 145 | 8 | 6 | 2,000 | 809 | 528 | 31.2 | Base |
| 10 | 90 | 155 | 9 | 5 | 1,500 | 828 | 538 | 34.8 | Base |
| 11 | 90 | 165 | 6 | 4 | 3,000 | 750 | 499 | 26.0 | Base |
| 12 | 90 | 175 | 7 | 3 | 2,500 | 788 | 516 | 29.8 | Base |
| 13 | 100 | 145 | 9 | 4 | 2,500 | 761 | 507 | 26.7 | Base |
| 14 | 100 | 155 | 8 | 3 | 3,000 | 740 | 498 | 26.2 | Base |
| 15 | 100 | 165 | 7 | 6 | 1,500 | 728 | 494 | 25.3 | Base |
| 16 | 100 | 175 | 6 | 5 | 2,000 | 720 | 490 | 24.8 | Base |
| Base metal | 620 | 450 | 25 | - | |||||
Table 6 Experimental results of tensile test
| Exp. No. | HP (MPa) | UP (MPa) | HT (s) | UT (s) | SoR (r/min) | Ultimate tensile strength (MPa) | Yield strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Fracture location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | 145 | 6 | 3 | 1,500 | 752 | 502 | 26.3 | Base |
| 2 | 70 | 155 | 7 | 4 | 2,000 | 766 | 508 | 27.2 | Base |
| 3 | 70 | 165 | 8 | 5 | 2,500 | 781 | 517 | 28.4 | Base |
| 4 | 70 | 175 | 9 | 6 | 3,000 | 805 | 516 | 31.1 | Base |
| 5 | 80 | 145 | 7 | 5 | 3,000 | 822 | 520 | 34.1 | Base |
| 6 | 80 | 155 | 6 | 6 | 2,500 | 758 | 508 | 26.7 | Base |
| 7 | 80 | 165 | 9 | 3 | 2,000 | 762 | 507 | 26.8 | Base |
| 8 | 80 | 175 | 8 | 4 | 1,500 | 785 | 516 | 29.2 | Base |
| 9 | 90 | 145 | 8 | 6 | 2,000 | 809 | 528 | 31.2 | Base |
| 10 | 90 | 155 | 9 | 5 | 1,500 | 828 | 538 | 34.8 | Base |
| 11 | 90 | 165 | 6 | 4 | 3,000 | 750 | 499 | 26.0 | Base |
| 12 | 90 | 175 | 7 | 3 | 2,500 | 788 | 516 | 29.8 | Base |
| 13 | 100 | 145 | 9 | 4 | 2,500 | 761 | 507 | 26.7 | Base |
| 14 | 100 | 155 | 8 | 3 | 3,000 | 740 | 498 | 26.2 | Base |
| 15 | 100 | 165 | 7 | 6 | 1,500 | 728 | 494 | 25.3 | Base |
| 16 | 100 | 175 | 6 | 5 | 2,000 | 720 | 490 | 24.8 | Base |
| Base metal | 620 | 450 | 25 | - | |||||
| Exp. No. | Impact strength (J) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room temperature | -50 °C | -100 °C | -150 °C | -196 °C | |
| 1 | 163 | 62 | 50 | 41 | 14 |
| 2 | 176 | 68 | 53 | 42 | 15 |
| 3 | 183 | 75 | 55 | 42 | 17 |
| 4 | 192 | 86 | 57 | 43 | 19 |
| 5 | 186 | 70 | 52 | 41 | 15 |
| 6 | 193 | 75 | 54 | 44 | 16 |
| 7 | 198 | 78 | 57 | 46 | 18 |
| 8 | 202 | 87 | 51 | 41 | 21 |
| 9 | 186 | 79 | 56 | 38 | 15 |
| 10 | 192 | 84 | 57 | 41 | 20 |
| 11 | 194 | 88 | 58 | 43 | 21 |
| 12 | 197 | 90 | 60 | 45 | 24 |
| 13 | 196 | 87 | 57 | 39 | 18 |
| 14 | 202 | 90 | 58 | 41 | 22 |
| 15 | 205 | 92 | 60 | 44 | 26 |
| 16 | 208 | 95 | 62 | 47 | 30 |
| Base metal | 160 | 70 | 40 | 30 | 11 |
Table 7 Impact toughness of friction welds
| Exp. No. | Impact strength (J) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room temperature | -50 °C | -100 °C | -150 °C | -196 °C | |
| 1 | 163 | 62 | 50 | 41 | 14 |
| 2 | 176 | 68 | 53 | 42 | 15 |
| 3 | 183 | 75 | 55 | 42 | 17 |
| 4 | 192 | 86 | 57 | 43 | 19 |
| 5 | 186 | 70 | 52 | 41 | 15 |
| 6 | 193 | 75 | 54 | 44 | 16 |
| 7 | 198 | 78 | 57 | 46 | 18 |
| 8 | 202 | 87 | 51 | 41 | 21 |
| 9 | 186 | 79 | 56 | 38 | 15 |
| 10 | 192 | 84 | 57 | 41 | 20 |
| 11 | 194 | 88 | 58 | 43 | 21 |
| 12 | 197 | 90 | 60 | 45 | 24 |
| 13 | 196 | 87 | 57 | 39 | 18 |
| 14 | 202 | 90 | 58 | 41 | 22 |
| 15 | 205 | 92 | 60 | 44 | 26 |
| 16 | 208 | 95 | 62 | 47 | 30 |
| Base metal | 160 | 70 | 40 | 30 | 11 |
Fig. 9 Typical SEM fractured surfaces of the impact tested samples: a room temp. (Exp. No. 4), b -50 °C (Exp. No. 8), c -100 °C (Exp. No. 14), d -196 °C (Exp. No. 16)
| Exp. No. | Corrosion current | Corrosion rate |
|---|---|---|
| I corr ×10-5 (mA/cm2) | (mm/y) | |
| 1 | 7.244 | 0.00078041 |
| 2 | 7.439 | 0.0008015 |
| 3 | 7.723 | 0.00089432 |
| 4 | 7.982 | 0.00091212 |
| 5 | 8.175 | 0.00092132 |
| 6 | 6.891 | 0.00053412 |
| 7 | 6.363 | 0.00049821 |
| 8 | 5.849 | 0.00039436 |
| 9 | 5.392 | 0.00039124 |
| 10 | 4.267 | 0.00048132 |
| 11 | 5.482 | 0.00039985 |
| 12 | 4.327 | 0.00048235 |
| 13 | 3.629 | 0.00041734 |
| 14 | 2.683 | 0.00029832 |
| 15 | 1.916 | 0.00021968 |
| 16 | 4.482 | 0.00038426 |
| Base metal | 8.312 | 0.00093484 |
Table 8 Experimental results of corrosion test
| Exp. No. | Corrosion current | Corrosion rate |
|---|---|---|
| I corr ×10-5 (mA/cm2) | (mm/y) | |
| 1 | 7.244 | 0.00078041 |
| 2 | 7.439 | 0.0008015 |
| 3 | 7.723 | 0.00089432 |
| 4 | 7.982 | 0.00091212 |
| 5 | 8.175 | 0.00092132 |
| 6 | 6.891 | 0.00053412 |
| 7 | 6.363 | 0.00049821 |
| 8 | 5.849 | 0.00039436 |
| 9 | 5.392 | 0.00039124 |
| 10 | 4.267 | 0.00048132 |
| 11 | 5.482 | 0.00039985 |
| 12 | 4.327 | 0.00048235 |
| 13 | 3.629 | 0.00041734 |
| 14 | 2.683 | 0.00029832 |
| 15 | 1.916 | 0.00021968 |
| 16 | 4.482 | 0.00038426 |
| Base metal | 8.312 | 0.00093484 |
| [1] | J. Charles, Weld.World (UK) 36, 43(1995) |
| [2] | J.B. Vogt,Mater. Proc. Technol. 117, 364(2001) |
| [3] | A. Mateo, L. Llanes, N. Akdut, M. Anglada,Mater. Sci. Eng.A 319-321, 516(2001) |
| [4] | R.D. Kane,Adv. Mater. Proc. 144(1), 16(1993) |
| [5] | B. Josefson, J.O. Nilsson, A. Wilson, Proc. Conf. Duplex Stainl. Steel 91, 67 (1991) |
| [6] | C. Petterson, S. Fager,Welding Practice for the Sandvik Duplex Stainless Steels SAF2304, SAF2205 and SAF2507 (AB Sandvik Steel, S811 81 Sandviken, 1995), p. 81 |
| [7] | J.O. Nilsson,Mater. Sci. Techbol. 8, 685(1992) |
| [8] | T. Thorvaldsson, H. Eriksson, J. Kutka, A. Salwén, Influence of microstructure on mechanical properties of a duplex stainless steel. Stainless Steel ‘84, Göteborg, 1, 101(1984) |
| [9] | R.N. Gunn, in fracture toughness due to intermetallic precipitates in duplex stainless steels. Duplex America 2000, Houston(2000), pp. 299-314 |
| [10] | L. Karlsson, L. Bengtsson, U. Rolander, S. Pak,Applications of Stainless Steel ‘92, Stockholm, vol. 1(1992), pp. 335-344 |
| [11] | S. Hertzman, B. Lehtinen, E. Symniotis-Barradal,Applications of Stainless Steel ‘92, Stockholm, vol.1 (1992), pp. 345-359 |
| [12] | L. Karlsson, S. Rigdal, F. Lake, Effects of intermetallic phases in duplex stainless steel weldments. Duplex America 2000, Houston, (2000), pp. 257-272 |
| [13] | L. Karlsson,Duplex stainless steel weld metals-effects of secondary phases. Duplex Stainless Steels’97, Maastricht, vol.1 (1997) pp. 43-58 |
| [14] | M. Liljas, The welding metallurgy of duplex stainless steels. Duplex Stainless Steels ’94, Glasgow, 1994 |
| Y.S. Sato, T.W. Nelson, C.J. Sterling, R.K. Steel, C.O. Pettersson, Mater. Sci.Eng. A 397, 376 (2005) | |
| [16] | Z.M. Cvijović, D.V. Mihajlović, V.R. Knežević,Mater. Sci. Forum 282-283, 323(1998) |
| [17] | H. Mumin Sachin, E. Akata, J. Mater. Process.Technol. 142, 239(2003) |
| [18] | M. Sahin, J. Mater.Des. 28, 2244(2007) |
| [19] | Duplex Stainless Steel, |
| [20] | J.C. Lippold, I. Varol, V.A.Baeslack III, in Duplex Stainless Steels’91, ed. by J. Charles, S. Bernhardsson(Les Editions de Physique, Les Ulis, 1991), p. 383 |
| [21] | J.C.Lippold, W. Lin, S. Brandi, I. Varol, W.A. Baeslack, in: Duplex Stainless Steels’94, Glasgow, 1994, ed. by T.G. Gooch, Paper 116 |
| [22] | E.I. Kivineva, N.E. Hannerz, in: Duplex Stainless Steels’94, Glasgow, 1994, ed. by T.G. Gooch, Paper 7 |
| [23] | P.A. Molian, J. Mater.Sci.Lett. 4, 281(1985) |
| [24] | S. Heino, E.M. Knutson-Wedel, B. Karlsson, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 15(1), 101(1999) |
| [25] | N. Suutala, Metall. Mater.Trans.A 14, 191 (1983) |
| [26] | O.H. Ibrahim, I.S. Ibrahim, T.A.F .Khalifa, Eng. Fail. Anal. 17, 1069(2010) |
| [27] | W.J. Mills,Int. Met. Rev. 42(1997) |
| [28] | J.W. Chan,Adv. Cryog. Eng. 55, 38(1992) |
| [29] | G. Han, S. Fukuyama, K. Yokogawa,Mater. Sci. Technol. 15, 909(1999) |
| [30] | R. Kacar, M. Acarer, Mater. Sci.Eng.A 363, 290 (2003) |
| [31] | H. Sieurin, R. Sandstom,Eng. Fract. Mech. 73, 377(2006) |
| [32] | Z. Sun, M. Kuo, I. Annergren, D. Pan, Mater. Sci.Eng.A 356, 274 (2003) |
| [1] | Xinqi Ji, Yue Zhang, Wenhan Jin, Xin Qi. A strategy on the consistency of tensile strength of friction stir lap welding joint based on the same peak temperature [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 78-87. |
| [2] | Zheng-Hong Liu, Ying Han, Jia-Peng Sun, Ming-Kun Jiang, Ying Song, Guo-Qing Zu, Xu Ran. A Novel Cu-Modified 20Cr Lean Duplex Stainless Steel with Exceptional Combination of Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1361-1370. |
| [3] | Xinghui Wang, Yu Yan, Wen Zhang, Huijun Kang, Enyu Guo, Zongning Chen, Rongchun Chen, Tongmin Wang. Enhanced Thermoelectric and Mechanical Properties of ZrNiSn Half-Heusler Compounds by Excess Ag Doping at Ni Sites [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(5): 763-771. |
| [4] | Cuicui Shu, Pengcheng Zhai, Xiege Huang, Sergey I. Morozov, Guodong Li, Zhiyuan Pan. First Principles Study of CoSb3/Ni Interface Structure and Mechanical Properties [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(5): 793-802. |
| [5] | Hong Chen, Ruitao Qu, Haotian Ma, Kexing Song, Feng Liu. Simultaneously Enhanced Strength and Fracture Resistance in HfNbTaTiZr Refractory High-Entropy Alloy at Higher Strain Rate [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(4): 529-541. |
| [6] | Yiqi Zhou, Decheng Kong, Ruixue Li, Xing He, Chaofang Dong. Corrosion of Duplex Stainless Steel Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion: A Critical Review [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(4): 587-606. |
| [7] | Zhenghong Liu, Zhigang Wu, Ying Han, Xiaolei Song, Guoqing Zu, Weiwei Zhu, Xu Ran. Combination of High Yield Strength and Improved Ductility of 21Cr Lean Duplex Stainless Steel by Tailoring Cold Deformation and Low-Temperature Short-Term Aging [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(4): 695-702. |
| [8] | Dongmei Pu, Xianhua Chen, Jingfeng Wang, Jun Tan, Jianbo Li, Hong Yang, Bo Feng, Kaihong Zheng, Fusheng Pan. Aging Behavior of As-Extruded Ti Particles Reinforced VW94 Composites [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(3): 401-406. |
| [9] | Zhihong Zhu, Wenhang Ning, Xuanyang Niu, Yuhong Zhao. Machine Learning-Based Research on Tensile Strength of SiC-Reinforced Magnesium Matrix Composites via Stir Casting [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(3): 453-466. |
| [10] | Yong-Chao Gai, Rui Zhang, Chuan-Yong Cui, Zi-Jian Zhou, Yi Tan, Yi-Zhou Zhou, Xiao-Feng Sun. Hot Compression Behavior and Tensile Property of a Novel Ni-Co-Based Superalloy Prepared by Electron Beam Smelting Layered Solidification Technology [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(2): 283-292. |
| [11] | Chao Xia, Kexin Zhao, Xin Zhou, Yuqi He, Panpan Gao, Hengxin Zhang, Guangrui Gao, Fengying Zhang, Hua Tan. Effect of Microstructural Characteristics on Fracture Toughness in Direct Energy Deposited Novel Ti-6Al-4V-1Mo Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2024, 37(1): 119-131. |
| [12] | Ronghe Gao, Feng Li, Huaqiu Du, Pengda Huo. Dynamic Recrystallization Mechanism and Texture Evolution during Interactive Alternating Extruded Magnesium Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(8): 1292-1304. |
| [13] | Tuhin Das, Salim V. Brahimi, Jun Song, Stephen Yue. Assessment of Hydrogen Embrittlement Susceptibility and Mechanism(s) in Quench and Tempered AISI 4135 Steel Using A Novel Fast Fracture Test in Bending [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(7): 1078-1094. |
| [14] | Hui Jiang, Li Li, Jianming Wang, Chengbin Wei, Qiang Zhang, Chunjian Su, Huaiming Sui. Wear Properties of Spark Plasma-Sintered AlCoCrFeNi2.1 Eutectic High Entropy Alloy with NbC Additions [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(6): 987-998. |
| [15] | Xueli Wang, Xin Ji, Bin He, Dongpo Wang, Chengning Li, Yongchang Liu, Wei Guan, Lei Cui. Prediction of M-A Constituents and Impact Toughness in Stir Zone of X80 Pipeline Steel Friction Stir Welds [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2023, 36(4): 573-585. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
WeChat
