Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2015, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 758-765.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-015-0258-0
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
G. Vimal1, Kamal P. Mani1, P. R. Biju1, Cyriac Joseph1(
), N. V. Unnikrishnan1, M. A. Ittyachen1
Received:2014-10-02
Revised:2014-12-14
Online:2015-03-24
Published:2015-07-23
G. Vimal, Kamal P. Mani, P. R. Biju, Cyriac Joseph, N. V. Unnikrishnan, M. A. Ittyachen. Influences of Annealing Temperature and Doping Concentration on Microstructural and Optical Properties of CeO2:Sm3+ Nanocrystals[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2015, 28(6): 758-765.
| Annealing temperature (°C) | Sm3+ concentration (mol%) | 2θ (°) | a (Å) | Crystal volume (Å3) | Strain (10-4) | Size from HW plot (nm) | Size from Scherrer equation (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 600 | 0 | 28.65 | 5.405 | 157.95 | 0.818 | 25 | 25 |
| 0.5 | 28.65 | 5.405 | 157.95 | 1.01 | 24 | 23 | |
| 1 | 28.648 | 5.405 | 157.95 | 1.54 | 22 | 22 | |
| 1.5 | 28.638 | 5.405 | 157.95 | 2.25 | 25 | 24 | |
| 2 | 28.58 | 5.409 | 158.23 | 2.34 | 23 | 22 | |
| 5 | 28.60 | 5.413 | 158.63 | 2.91 | 23 | 21 | |
| 10 | 28.55 | 5.418 | 159.02 | 5.01 | 20 | 19 | |
| 20 | 28.45 | 5.427 | 159.92 | 5.46 | 18 | 16 | |
| 800 | 0 | 28.75 | 5.40 | 157.57 | 0.285 | 70 | 63 |
| 0.5 | 28.70 | 5.402 | 157.63 | 0.34 | 67 | 61 | |
| 1 | 28.68 | 5.402 | 157.63 | 0.495 | 69 | 63 | |
| 1.5 | 28.68 | 5.403 | 157.76 | 1.25 | 77 | 67 | |
| 2 | 28.67 | 5.404 | 157.85 | 1.57 | 72 | 59 | |
| 5 | 28.65 | 5.411 | 158.46 | 1.76 | 69 | 56 | |
| 10 | 28.60 | 5.419 | 159.14 | 2.39 | 46 | 37 | |
| 20 | 28.53 | 5.429 | 160.02 | 2.62 | 46 | 36 |
Table 1 Crystalline size, lattice parameter, crystal volume and microstrain of pure and Sm3+-doped CeO2 annealed at 600 and 800 °C
| Annealing temperature (°C) | Sm3+ concentration (mol%) | 2θ (°) | a (Å) | Crystal volume (Å3) | Strain (10-4) | Size from HW plot (nm) | Size from Scherrer equation (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 600 | 0 | 28.65 | 5.405 | 157.95 | 0.818 | 25 | 25 |
| 0.5 | 28.65 | 5.405 | 157.95 | 1.01 | 24 | 23 | |
| 1 | 28.648 | 5.405 | 157.95 | 1.54 | 22 | 22 | |
| 1.5 | 28.638 | 5.405 | 157.95 | 2.25 | 25 | 24 | |
| 2 | 28.58 | 5.409 | 158.23 | 2.34 | 23 | 22 | |
| 5 | 28.60 | 5.413 | 158.63 | 2.91 | 23 | 21 | |
| 10 | 28.55 | 5.418 | 159.02 | 5.01 | 20 | 19 | |
| 20 | 28.45 | 5.427 | 159.92 | 5.46 | 18 | 16 | |
| 800 | 0 | 28.75 | 5.40 | 157.57 | 0.285 | 70 | 63 |
| 0.5 | 28.70 | 5.402 | 157.63 | 0.34 | 67 | 61 | |
| 1 | 28.68 | 5.402 | 157.63 | 0.495 | 69 | 63 | |
| 1.5 | 28.68 | 5.403 | 157.76 | 1.25 | 77 | 67 | |
| 2 | 28.67 | 5.404 | 157.85 | 1.57 | 72 | 59 | |
| 5 | 28.65 | 5.411 | 158.46 | 1.76 | 69 | 56 | |
| 10 | 28.60 | 5.419 | 159.14 | 2.39 | 46 | 37 | |
| 20 | 28.53 | 5.429 | 160.02 | 2.62 | 46 | 36 |
Fig. 3 XRD peak corresponds to the (111) plane CeO2 for different doping concentrations of Sm3+ and splitting of the peak of Sm3+ doping concentration of 20 mol% (inset)
| Annealing Temperature (°C) | Sm3+ (%) | X-ray density (g/cm3) | Specific surface area (m2/gm) | Bulk density (g/cm3) | Porosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 600 | 0 | 7.24 | 33.2 | 5.77 | 0.20 |
| 0.5 | 7.24 | 36 | 5.64 | 0.22 | |
| 1 | 7.24 | 37.7 | 5.20 | 0.28 | |
| 1.5 | 7.24 | 34.5 | 5.15 | 0.29 | |
| 2 | 7.23 | 37.7 | 5.10 | 0.30 | |
| 5 | 7.21 | 39.6 | 5.04 | 0.30 | |
| 10 | 7.20 | 43.9 | 4.89 | 0.32 | |
| 20 | 7.16 | 52.3 | 4.57 | 0.36 | |
| 800 | 0 | 7.25 | 11.8 | 6.28 | 0.13 |
| 0.5 | 7.25 | 12.3 | 6.2 | 0.14 | |
| 1 | 7.25 | 12 | 6.30 | 0.13 | |
| 1.5 | 7.25 | 10.8 | 6.25 | 0.14 | |
| 2 | 7.22 | 11.5 | 6.22 | 0.14 | |
| 5 | 7.22 | 12 | 6.2 | 0.14 | |
| 10 | 7.19 | 18.1 | 6.18 | 0.14 | |
| 20 | 7.15 | 18.2 | 5.6 | 0.22 |
Table 2 X-ray density, specific surface area, bulk density and porosity of pure and Sm3+-doped CeO2 annealed at 600 and 800 °C
| Annealing Temperature (°C) | Sm3+ (%) | X-ray density (g/cm3) | Specific surface area (m2/gm) | Bulk density (g/cm3) | Porosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 600 | 0 | 7.24 | 33.2 | 5.77 | 0.20 |
| 0.5 | 7.24 | 36 | 5.64 | 0.22 | |
| 1 | 7.24 | 37.7 | 5.20 | 0.28 | |
| 1.5 | 7.24 | 34.5 | 5.15 | 0.29 | |
| 2 | 7.23 | 37.7 | 5.10 | 0.30 | |
| 5 | 7.21 | 39.6 | 5.04 | 0.30 | |
| 10 | 7.20 | 43.9 | 4.89 | 0.32 | |
| 20 | 7.16 | 52.3 | 4.57 | 0.36 | |
| 800 | 0 | 7.25 | 11.8 | 6.28 | 0.13 |
| 0.5 | 7.25 | 12.3 | 6.2 | 0.14 | |
| 1 | 7.25 | 12 | 6.30 | 0.13 | |
| 1.5 | 7.25 | 10.8 | 6.25 | 0.14 | |
| 2 | 7.22 | 11.5 | 6.22 | 0.14 | |
| 5 | 7.22 | 12 | 6.2 | 0.14 | |
| 10 | 7.19 | 18.1 | 6.18 | 0.14 | |
| 20 | 7.15 | 18.2 | 5.6 | 0.22 |
Fig. 4 SEM images of the crystals: a CeO2 annealed at 400 °C; b CeO2 doped with 1 mol% Sm3+ annealed at 400 °C; c CeO2 annealed at 600 °C; d CeO2 doped with 1 mol% Sm3+ annealed at 600 °C; e CeO2 annealed at 800°C; f CeO2 doped with 1 mol% Sm3+ annealed at 800 °C
Fig. 5 TEM images of the crystals: a pure CeO2 annealed at 400 °C; b CeO2 doped with 1 mol% Sm3+ annealed at 400 °C; c HRTEM and SAED pattern of pure CeO2 annealed at 400 °C; d pure CeO2 annealed at 600 °C
| [1] | N. Brahme, A. Gupta, D.P. Bisen, R.S. Kher, S.J. Dhoble,Phys. Proc. 29, 97(2012) |
| [2] | J.C. Wang, C.T. Lin, C.H. Huang, C.S. Lai, C.H. Liao,Microelectron. Reliab. 52, 1627(2012) |
| [3] | G. Mialon, S. Turkcan, A. Alexandrou, T. Gacoin, J.P. Boilot, J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 18699 (2009) |
| [4] | G. Kim, N. Lee, K.B. Kim, B.K. Kim, H. Chang, S.J. Song, J.Y. Park, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38, 1571 (2013) |
| [5] | T. Miki, T. Ogawa, M. Haneda, N. Kakuta, A. Ueno, S. Tateishi, S. Matsuura, M. Sato, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 6464(1990) |
| [6] | S. Tsunekawa, T. Fukuda, A. Kasuya, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 1318(2000) |
| [7] | J.H. Cho, M. Bass, S. Babu, J.M. Dowding, W.T. Self, S. Seal, J. Lumin. 132, 743(2012) |
| [8] | G. Jose, G. Jose, V. Thomas, C. Joseph, M.A. Ittyachen, N.V. Unnikrishnan, J. Flouresc. 14, 733(2004) |
| [9] | G. Jose, C. Joseph, M.A. Ittyachen, N.V. Unnikrishnan,Opt. Mater. 29, 1495(2007) |
| [10] | V. Thomas, A. Elizebeth, H. Thomas, G. Jose, N.V. Unnikrishnan, C. Joseph, M.A. Ittyachen, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 7, 2687(2005) |
| [11] | R. Ghosh, D. Basaka, S. Fujihara, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 2689(2004) |
| [12] | H. Yahiro, K. Eguchi, H. Arai,Solid State Ion. 36, 71(1989) |
| [13] | Z. Fan, P.C. Chang, J.G. Lu, E.C. Walter, R.M. Penner, C.H. Lin, H.P. Lee,Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6128(2004) |
| [14] | S. Babu, A. Schulte, S. Seal,Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 123112(2008) |
| [15] | N.S. Kumar, K.V. Bangera, G.K. Shivakumar,Superlattices Microstruct. 75, 303(2014) |
| [16] | F.H. Chung, D.K. Smith, Industrial Applications of X-ray Diffraction (Marcel Dekker Inc, NewYork, 2000) |
| [17] | A. Khorsand Zak, W.H.A. Majid, M.E. Abrishami, R. Yousef, Solid State Sci. 13, 251(2011) |
| [18] | A. Kumar, S. Babu, A.S. Karakoti, A. Schulte, S. Seal, Langmuir 25, 10998 (2009) |
| [19] | R. Tholkappiyan, K. Vishista, Phys. B 448, 177 (2014) |
| [20] | S.A. Safaan, A.M. Abo El Ata, M.S. El Messeery, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 302, 362(2006) |
| [21] | M. Mogensen, N.M. Sammes, G.A. Tompsett,Solid State Ion. 129, 63(2000) |
| [22] | L.P. Zhu, G.H. Liao, N.C. Bing, L.L. Wang, H.Y. Xie,J. Solid State Chem. 184, 2405(2011) |
| [23] | G. Vimal, P.M. Kamal, P.R. Biju, C. Joseph, N.V. Unnikrishnan, M.A. Ittyachen, Spectrochim. Acta A 122, 624 (2014) |
| [24] | J.P. Hos, P.G. McCormick, Scr. Mater. 48, 85(2003) |
| [25] | N. Sutradhar, A. Sinhamahapatra, S. Pahari, M. Jayachandran, B. Subramanian, H.C. Bajaj, A.B. Panda, J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 7628 (2011) |
| [26] | C. Joseph, M.A. Ittyachen, K.S. Raju,Bull. Mater. Sci. 20, 37(1997) |
| [27] | I. Petrov, B. Soptrajanov, Spectrochim. Acta A 31, 309 (1975) |
| [28] | M.M. Natile, G. Boccaletti, A. Glisenti,Chem. Mater. 17, 6272(2005) |
| [29] | G. Vimal, K.P. Mani, P.R. Biju, C. Joseph, N.V. Unnikrishnan, M.A. Ittyachen, Appl. Nanosci. (2014). doi:10.1007/s13204-014-0375-5 |
| [30] | L. Li, S. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 21438 (2006) |
| [31] | G. Lakshminarayana, H. Yang, Y. Teng, J. Qiu, J. Lumin. 129, 59(2009) |
| [32] | G. Blasse, B.C. Grabmaier, Luminescent Materials (Springer, Berlin, 1994) |
| [1] | Shang Zhao, Zhaolin Wang, Mingliang Wang, Zeyu Ding, Yiping Lu. A critical review of advances and application prospects of soft magnetic high entropy alloys [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 1-7. |
| [2] | Wei-Peng Chen, Jia-Qi Pei, Hua Hou, Yu-Hong Zhao. Phase-field simulation of α-Mg dendrite growth in magnesium alloys: A review [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 48-61. |
| [3] | Xinqi Ji, Yue Zhang, Wenhan Jin, Xin Qi. A strategy on the consistency of tensile strength of friction stir lap welding joint based on the same peak temperature [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 78-87. |
| [4] | Peng Han, Wen Wang, Jun Cai, Jia Lin, Hubin Yang, Qianzhi Ma, Feng Gao, Ke Qiao, Fengming Qiang, Kuaishe Wang. Excellent superplasticity for lamellar microstructure in nugget of a double-sided friction stir welded Ti-4.5Al-3V-2Mo-2Fe alloy joint [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 110-123. |
| [5] | Lei Qin, Shengfeng Zhou, Jianbo Jin, Huan Yang, Kunmao Li, Cheng Deng, Yujie Yuan, Seyed Reza Elmi Hosseini, Lai-Chang Zhang. Effect of molybdenum content on the microstructure and tribological properties of Ti-Nb-Cu alloys produced by LPBF additive manufacturing [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 13-25. |
| [6] | X.L. Wang, J.Y. Li, Q.S. Mei. Recent progress in Zn matrix composites for biomedical applications [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 26-37. |
| [7] | Kunmao Li, Shengfeng Zhou, Jing Liu, Feng Yang, Chengliang Yang. A review on the biomedical Ti-Cu alloys: Design, preparation, microstructure and properties [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 47-67. |
| [8] | Huihui Wang, Qianying Guo, Chong Li, Lei Cui, Yiming Huang, Yongchang Liu. Effect of Ti2AlC Addition on the Microstructure and Mechanical Property of Additive Manufactured Inconel 718 Alloys via Laser Powder Bed Fusion [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1481-1498. |
| [9] | B. M. Shi, Y. T. Pang, B. H. Shan, B. B. Wang, Y. Liu, P. Xue, J. F. Zhang, Y. N. Zan, Q. Z. Wang, B. L. Xiao, Z. Y. Ma. Microstructure Evolution and Fracture Behavior of (B4C+Al2O3)/Al Friction Stir Welded Joints [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1513-1526. |
| [10] | H. Q. Dai, N. Li, L. H. Wu, J. Wang, P. Xue, F. C. Liu, D. R. Ni, B. L. Xiao, Z. Y. Ma. Low-Temperature Superplastic Deformation Behavior of Bimodal Microstructure of Friction Stir Processed Ti-6Al-4V Alloy [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1559-1569. |
| [11] | Shuyi Ren, Jiao Li, Kai Wu, Xiaoge Li, Yaqiang Wang, Jinyu Zhang, Gang Liu, Jun Sun. Thermal Stability and Mechanical Properties of Nanotwinned Ni-W Alloyed Films [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1570-1582. |
| [12] | Hongliang Liu, Jingpei Nie, Liwei Bai, Yujing Fu, Xiaoguang Yang, Zhen Chang, Xue Zhang, Ying Li. Preparation and Anti-Oxidation Mechanism of an Inventive Preprocessing Method for Press-Hardened Steels [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1604-1612. |
| [13] | F. S. Li, L. H. Wu, Y. Kan, H. B. Zhao, D. R. Ni, P. Xue, B. L. Xiao, Z. Y. Ma. Microstructure Evolution and Fracture Mechanisms in Electron Beam Welded Joint of Ti-6Al-4V ELI Alloy Ultra-thick Plates [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1317-1330. |
| [14] | Zheng-Hong Liu, Ying Han, Jia-Peng Sun, Ming-Kun Jiang, Ying Song, Guo-Qing Zu, Xu Ran. A Novel Cu-Modified 20Cr Lean Duplex Stainless Steel with Exceptional Combination of Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1361-1370. |
| [15] | Sen Ge, Ben Niu, Zhen-Hua Wang, Qian-Fu Pan, Chao-Hong Liu, Qing Wang. Recrystallization Behavior and Mechanical Property of a Medium-Si 12%Cr Reduced Activation Ferritic/Martensitic Steel Cladding Tube During the Manufacture [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1385-1396. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
WeChat
