Metals Advances ›› 2026, Vol. 42: 92-106.DOI: 10.1016/j.metadv.2026.02.025
Jing-Xiang Zhao, Kun-Kun Deng(
), Yi-Jia Li, Cui-Ju Wang, Kai-Bo Nie, Zhong-Sen Huang, Yi-Ming Zhu
Received:2025-10-21
Revised:2026-01-01
Accepted:2026-01-04
Online:2026-04-10
Published:2026-04-20
Contact:
Jing-Xiang Zhao, Kun-Kun Deng, Yi-Jia Li, Cui-Ju Wang, Kai-Bo Nie, Zhong-Sen Huang, Yi-Ming Zhu. Microstructure and mechanical properties of shear spun Mg-5Zn-1Gd-1Y-1Mn alloy[J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 42: 92-106.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Fig. 1. (a) Cross rolling deformation diagram; (b) sampling diagram of plate after rolling annealing; (c) shear spinning deformation diagram; (d) shear spinning component diagram, microstructure observation sampling position and tensile sample size.
| Zn | Gd | Y | Mn | Ni | Sn | Al | Mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.65 | 1.18 | 1.35 | 0.98 | 0.0018 | 0.0021 | 0.022 | Bal. |
Table 1. Composition of ZGWM5111 alloy (wt%).
| Zn | Gd | Y | Mn | Ni | Sn | Al | Mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.65 | 1.18 | 1.35 | 0.98 | 0.0018 | 0.0021 | 0.022 | Bal. |
| Rolling passes | Thicknesses (mm) | Deformation (%) | Annealing time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TD: 8.3→7.5 | 10 | 20 |
| 2 | RD: 7.5→7.0 | 5 | 5 |
| 3 | TD: 7.0→5.9 | 15 | 10 |
| 4 | RD: 5.9→5.4 | 10 | 5 |
| 5 | TD: 5.4→4.3 | 20 | 10 |
| 6 | RD: 4.3→3.6 | 15 | 5 |
| 7 | TD: 3.6→2.5 | 30 | 10 |
| 8 | RD: 2.5→2.0 | 20 | 5 |
Table 2. Cross rolling process of ZGWM5111 alloy.
| Rolling passes | Thicknesses (mm) | Deformation (%) | Annealing time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TD: 8.3→7.5 | 10 | 20 |
| 2 | RD: 7.5→7.0 | 5 | 5 |
| 3 | TD: 7.0→5.9 | 15 | 10 |
| 4 | RD: 5.9→5.4 | 10 | 5 |
| 5 | TD: 5.4→4.3 | 20 | 10 |
| 6 | RD: 4.3→3.6 | 15 | 5 |
| 7 | TD: 3.6→2.5 | 30 | 10 |
| 8 | RD: 2.5→2.0 | 20 | 5 |
| Forming parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Initial slab thickness, L (mm) | 2 |
| Roller diameter, Dr (mm) | 170 |
| Roller feed rate, f (mm/r) | 0.1 |
| Rotation speed of mandrel, n (r/min) | 80 |
| Thickness of spun workpiece | 2 |
| Roller number | 2 |
| Temperature (°C) | 400 ± 20 |
Table 3. Spinning process parameters of ZGWM5111 alloy.
| Forming parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Initial slab thickness, L (mm) | 2 |
| Roller diameter, Dr (mm) | 170 |
| Roller feed rate, f (mm/r) | 0.1 |
| Rotation speed of mandrel, n (r/min) | 80 |
| Thickness of spun workpiece | 2 |
| Roller number | 2 |
| Temperature (°C) | 400 ± 20 |
Fig. 3. SEM micrographs of ZGWM5111 alloys: (a) before shear spinning; (b) initial stage; (c) steady stage; (d) final stage; (e) the overall distribution of the secondary phase after spinning; (f) EDS of secondary phase.
| Positions | Elements (at.%) | Possible compounds | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg | Zn | Gd | Y | Mn | ||
| A | 40.8 | 39.2 | 6.8 | 12.9 | 0.3 | W phase |
| B | 35.3 | 41.8 | 9.3 | 13.2 | 0.4 | W phase |
| C | 98.4 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | MgZn2 |
| D | 50.1 | 32.8 | 6.7 | 10.1 | 0.3 | W phase |
| E | 98.3 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | MgZn2 |
Table 4. EDS analyses (at.%) of corresponding points in Fig. 3.
| Positions | Elements (at.%) | Possible compounds | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg | Zn | Gd | Y | Mn | ||
| A | 40.8 | 39.2 | 6.8 | 12.9 | 0.3 | W phase |
| B | 35.3 | 41.8 | 9.3 | 13.2 | 0.4 | W phase |
| C | 98.4 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | MgZn2 |
| D | 50.1 | 32.8 | 6.7 | 10.1 | 0.3 | W phase |
| E | 98.3 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | MgZn2 |
Fig. 5. TEM micrographs after shear spinning: (a, b) TEM bright field micrographs; SAED micrograph of (a1) W phase; (b1) SAED micrograph of MgZn2 phase; (c) HRTEM micrographs of MgZn2 phase and Mg; (d) HRTEM micrographs of W phase and Mg.
Fig. 6. IPF of ZGWM5111 alloy and its inverse pole diagram corresponding to the deformation direction: (a, a1) initial stage; (b, b1) steady stage; (c, c1) final spinning.
Fig. 9. Fractography of ZGWM5111 alloy before and after shear spinning: (a) OM of front side fracture; (b) SEM of spinning front side fracture; (c) SEM of the front fracture before spinning; (d) OM of side fracture after spinning; (e) SEM of side fracture after spinning; (f) SEM of front fracture after spinning.
Fig. 10. GOS diagrams of ZGWM5111 alloy before and after spinning: (a) before spinning; (b) initial stage; (c) steady stage; (d) final stage. KAM diagram: (e) before spinning; (f) initial stage; (g) steady stage; (h) final stage.
Fig. 11. Grain orientation angles of ZGWM5111 alloy before and after spinning: (a, a1) before spinning; (b, b1) initial stage; (c, c1) steady stage; (d, d1) final stage.
Fig. 12. Analysis of Abaqus: (a) illustration of shear spinning; (b) equivalent stress and strain nephogram of shear spinning; (c) spatial stress distribution in different stages of spinning process; (d) the equivalent stress and strain values in different stages of spinning process.
Fig. 13. Orientation distribution function (ODF) diagrams of ZGWM5111 alloy at different spinning positions: (a) before spinning; (b) initial stage; (c) steady stage; (d) final stage.
Fig. 14. KAM color pole figure: (a) before spinning; (b) initial stage; (c) steady stage; (d) final stage; (e) grain orientation of ZGWM5111 alloy sheet before and after spinning.
Fig. 15. IPF diagrams of typical area in different spinning stages of ZGWM5111 alloy: (a) initial stage; (b) steady stage; (c) final stage; the orientation angle distribution map of the typical region: (d) initial stage; (e) steady stage; (f) final stage; typical regional pole figure: (g) initial stage; (h) steady stage; (i) final stage.
| [1] | J. She, J. Chen, X. Xiong, Y. Yang, X. Peng, D. Chen, F. Pan, J. Magnes. Alloy. 12 (2024) 3441-3475. |
| [2] | F.F. Cao, C.J. Wang, K.B. Nie, Q.X. Shi, Y.J. Li, K.K. Deng, Acta Metall. Sin. -Engl. Lett. 38 (2025) 1777-1793. |
| [3] | X. Feng, L. Wang, X. Chen, K. Deng, X. Wang, L. Zheng, H. Wang, Q. Zhang, H. Kwon, B. Xing, K.S. Shin, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 34 (2025) 1165-1190. |
| [4] | P.C. Gautam, S. Biswas, J. Magnes. Alloy. 12 (2024) 2985-3002. |
| [5] | N. Thanabal, R. Silambarasan, P. Seenuvasaperumal, D.A. Basha, A. Elayaperumal, J. Magnes. Alloy. 12 (2024) 2624-2646. |
| [6] | J. Babu, A. Madarapu, D. Kodali, M.V. Ramana, J. Magnes. Alloy. 13 (2025) 1428-1475. |
| [7] | J.H. Cho, S.H. Han, G.Y. Lee, Materials 13 (2020) 3608. |
| [8] | C.C. Wong, T.A. Dean, J. Lin, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 43 (2003) 1419-1435. |
| [9] | J. Long, G. Xiao, Q. Xia, X. Wang, J. Magnes. Alloy. 12 (2024) 3229-3244. |
| [10] | O. Music, J.M. Allwood, K. Kawai, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 210 (2010) 3-23. |
| [11] | K. Mori, M. Ishiguro, Y. Isomura, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 209 (2009) 3621-3627. |
| [12] | R. Zeng, F. Ma, L. Huang, J. Li, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 80 (2015) 535-548. |
| [13] |
M. Zhan, X. Wang, H. Long, Mater. Des. 108 (2016) 207-216.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
D. Han, M. Zhan, H. Yang, Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 42 (2013) 243-248.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
S. Gondo, H. Arai, S. Kajino, K. Hanada, Mater. Charact. 188 (2022) 111877.
DOI URL |
| [16] | S. Wang, W. Xu, B. Shao, G. Yang, Y. Zong, W. Sun, Z. Yang, D. Shan, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 101 (2022) 1-17. |
| [17] | L.L. Li, Z.Y. Cai, H.Q. Xu, M. Wang, J. Yu, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75 (2014) 897-907. |
| [18] | F. Wang, P. Su, L. Qin, S. Dong, Y. Li, J. Dong, Acta Metall. Sin. -Engl. Lett. 33 (2020) 1226-1234. |
| [19] |
Y. Li, K. Deng, C. Wang, K. Nie, Q. Shi, P. Tian, G.W. Zhang, J. Alloy. Compd. 990 (2024) 174427.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
H. Chen, Z. Zhang, C. Zhang, P. Liu, S. Hu, J. Peng, X. Du, H. Wei, J. Alloy. Compd. 1022 (2025) 178474.
DOI URL |
| [21] | S.W. Cheong, H. Weiland, Mater. Sci. Forum 558 (2007) 153-158. |
| [22] |
W. Polkowski, P. Jóźwik, Z. Bojar, J. Alloy. Compd. 614 (2014) 226-233.
DOI URL |
| [23] | H. Mirzadeh, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 25 (2023) 7050-7077. |
| [24] |
S. Yu, C. Liu, Y. Gao, S. Jiang, Z. Bao, Mater. Charact. 131 (2017) 135-139.
DOI URL |
| [25] | N. Piao, F. Shi, W. Zhang, N. Zou, F. Yang, J. Wang, Y. Guo, S. Lu, L. Wang, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 29 (2024) 213-224. |
| [26] | R.D. Doherty, D.A. Hughes, F.J. Humphreys, J.J. Jonas, D. Juul Jensen, M.E. Kassner, W.E. King, T.R. McNelley, H.J. McQueen, A.D. Rollett, Mater. Today 1 (1998) 14-15. |
| [27] |
Y. Chen, Q. Li, X. Chen, J. Tan, H. He, Met. Mater. Int. 31 (2025) 563-581.
DOI |
| [28] | G. Wu, J. Yu, L. Jia, W. Xu, B. Dong, Z. Zhang, B. Hao, Materials 13 (2020) 4932. |
| [29] |
G. Sebastiani, A. Brosius, W. Homberg, M. Kleiner, Key Eng. Mater. 344 (2007) 637-644.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
J. Walek, R. Kocich, L. Kunčická, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 131 (2025) 107219.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
Y. Xu, J. Zhang, Y. Bai, M.A. Meyers, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39 (2008) 811-843.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
L. Saintoyant, L. Legras, Y. Bréchet, Scr. Mater. 64 (2011) 418-421.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
S. Lu, N. Ao, Q. Kan, S. Wu, G. Kang, X. Zhang, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 256 (2023) 108518.
DOI URL |
| [34] |
Y.J. Bréchet, H.S. Zurob, C.R. Hutchinson, Int. J. Mater. Res. 100 (2009) 1446-1448.
DOI URL |
| [35] | N. Lv, L. Zhao, H. Yan, B. Liu, R. Chen, Z. Shan, J. Magnes. Alloy. 13 (2025) 1099-1115. |
| [36] |
J. Su, A.S. H. Kabir, M. Sanjari, S. Yue, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 674 (2016) 343-360.
DOI URL |
| [37] | L.L.C. Catorceno, H.F.G. De Abreu, A.F. Padilha, J. Magnes. Alloy. 6 (2018) 121-133. |
| [38] | K. Yang, X. Li, M. Zhang, M. Shi, Y. Jiao, X. Yao, M. Ji, Q. Zheng, Z. Zhang, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 32 (2024) 1173-1186. |
| [39] | L.Y. Zhao, H. Yan, R.S. Chen, E.H. Han, J. Magnes. Alloy. 9 (2021) 818-828. |
| [40] |
Z. Huang, K. Deng, C. Wang, K. Nie, Q. Shi, H. Liu, C. Jia, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 921 (2025) 147581.
DOI URL |
| [41] |
L. Jiang, J.J. Jonas, R.K. Mishra, A.A. Luo, A.K. Sachdev, S. Godet, Acta Mater. 55 (2007) 3899-3910.
DOI URL |
| [42] |
X. Li, W. Qi, K. Zheng, N. Zhou, J. Magnes. Alloy. 1 (2013) 54-63.
DOI URL |
| [43] |
Z. Zareian, M. Emamy, M. Malekan, H. Mirzadeh, W.J. Kim, A. Bahmani, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 774 (2020) 138929.
DOI URL |
| [44] |
K. Deng, J. Shi, C. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Wu, K. Nie, K. Wu, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 43 (2012) 1280-1284.
DOI URL |
| [45] |
G.S. Rao, Y.V.R.K. Prasad, Metall. Trans. A 13 (1982) 2219-2226.
DOI URL |
| [46] |
J. Kang, C. Wang, K. Deng, K. Nie, Y. Bai, W. Li, J. Alloy. Compd. 720 (2017) 196-206.
DOI URL |
| [47] | Z. Zhao, K. Wang, M. Li, H. Wang, X. Zhang, L. Shen, L. Wang, L. Zheng, L. Song, H. Dong, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 39 (2025) 2502-2517. |
| [48] | D. Xu, X. Liu, H. Wu, D. An, Q. Hu, X. Li, J. Magnes. Alloy. 13 (2025) 5989-6000. |
| [49] |
Y. Bai, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Y. Bai, G. Wang, D. Zhao, X. Teng, W. Cheng, J. Alloy. Compd. 1050 (2026) 185570.
DOI URL |
| [50] | L. Wang, Y. Li, H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Q. Yang, Q. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Cheng, K.S. Shin, M. Vedani, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9 (2020) 12604-12625. |
| [51] |
S. Luo, F. Li, J.Y. Zhang, P.X. Wang, T. Ma, J. Alloy. Compd. 1039 (2025) 183049.
DOI URL |
| [1] | Fenghua Wang, Peng Su, Linxin Qin, Shuai Dong, Yunliang Li, Jie Dong. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg-3Al-Zn Magnesium Alloy Sheet by Hot Shear Spinning [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2020, 33(9): 1226-1234. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
WeChat
