research-article

Effect of Particle Size on the Hysteretic Behavior and Magnetocaloric Effect of La0.5Pr0.5Fe11.4Si1.6 Compound

  • Jiaohong Huang ,
  • Naikun Sun ,
  • Cuilan Liu ,
  • Yumei Ge ,
  • Tao Zhang ,
  • Feng Liu ,
  • Pingzhan Si
Expand
  • 1. Baotou Research Institute of Rare Earths, Baotou, 014030, China
    2. School of Science, Shenyang Ligong University, Shenyang, 110159, China
    3. College of Materials Science and Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

Received date: 2013-06-18

  Revised date: 2013-09-13

  Online published: 2014-03-11

Abstract

Bulk La0.5Pr0.5Fe11.4Si1.6 compound exhibits a large magnetic-entropy change ΔSm of 28.1 J/(kg K) for a magnetic-field change from 0 to 1.5 T at the Curie temperature, TC of 186 K, accompanied by a large magnetic hysteresis of 56 J/kg and a noticeable thermal hysteresis of about 1 K. If the bulk sample is ground into middle-size particles (30–60 μm), then the thermal hysteresis is almost eliminated and the magnetic hysteresis loss is decreased by 29%, while the large ΔSm maintains. Especially, fine powder with an average size of 2 μm shows the same TC as the bulk and does not lose stability. Meanwhile, a comparatively large ΔSm of 13.9 J/(kg K) and a hysteresis reduction of 70% are attained. The hysteresis reduction can be ascribed to the decrease of internal strains and to the improvement of heat transfer due to the increase of the ratio of the surface area to the volume.

Cite this article

Jiaohong Huang , Naikun Sun , Cuilan Liu , Yumei Ge , Tao Zhang , Feng Liu , Pingzhan Si . Effect of Particle Size on the Hysteretic Behavior and Magnetocaloric Effect of La0.5Pr0.5Fe11.4Si1.6 Compound[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2014 , 27(1) : 27 -30 . DOI: 10.1007/s40195-014-0031-9

References

[1] V.K. Pecharsky, K.A. Gschneidner Jr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4494(1997)10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4494
[2] O. Tegus, E. Brück, K.H.J. Buschow, F.R. de Boer, Nature 415, 150(2002)10.1038/415150a
[3] H. Wada, Y. Tanabe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3302(2001)10.1063/1.1419048
[4] W.B. Cui, W. Liu, X.H. Liu, S. Guo, Z. Han, X.G. Zhao, Z.D. Zhang, Mater. Lett. 63, 595(2009)10.1016/j.matlet.2008.11.056
[5] F.X. Hu, B.G. Shen, J.R. Sun, Z.H. Cheng, G.H. Rao, X.X. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3675(2001)10.1063/1.1375836
[6] J. Lyubina, R. Sch?fer, N. Martin, L. Schultz, O. Gutfleisch, Adv. Mater. 22, 3735(2010)10.1002/adma.201000177
[7] J. Shen, B. Gao, H.W. Zhang, F.X. Hu, Y.X. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 142504(2007)10.1063/1.2794412
[8] J.L. Zhao, J. Shen, F.X. Hu, Y.X. Li, J.R. Sun, B.G. Shen, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 113911(2010)10.1063/1.3374635
[9] X. Chen, Y.G. Chen, Y.B. Tang, Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 24, 390(2011)
[10] J. Liu, M. Krautz, K. Skokov, T.G. Woodcock, O. Gutfleisch, Acta Mater. 59, 3602(2011)10.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.033
[11] F.X. Hu, L. Chen, J. Wang, L.F. Bao, J.R. Sun, B.G. Shen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 072403(2012)10.1063/1.3684244
[12] J.D. Moore, G.K. Perkins, Y. Bugoslavsky, M.K. Chattopadhyay, S.B. Roy, P. Chaddah, V.K. Pecharsky, K.A. Gschneidner Jr, L.F. Cohen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 072501(2006)10.1063/1.2173631
[13] N.K. Sun, S.N. Xu, D. Li, Z.D. Zhang, Phys. Stat. Sol. A 208, 1950(2011)10.1002/pssa.201026735
[14] N.K. Sun, F. Liu, Y.B. Gao, J.J. Liu, Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 25, 76(2012)
[15] J.D. Moore, K. Morrison, K.G. Sandeman, M. Katter, L.F. Cohen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 252404(2009)
[16] N.K. Sun, F. Liu, Y.B. Gao, Z.Q. Cai, B.S. Du, S.N. Xu, P.Z. Si, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 112407(2012)10.1063/1.3695039
[17] G.J. Liu, J.R. Sun, J. Shen, B. Gao, H.W. Zhang, F.X. Hu, B.G. Shen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 032507(2007)10.1063/1.2425033
[18] Q. Zeng, I. Baker, V. McCreary, Z.C. Yan, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 318, 28(2007)10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.04.037
Options
Outlines

/