Research Articles

Nucleation barrier height in undercooled metallic melts

Expand
  • School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640,China

Online published: 2012-08-24

Abstract

The phase-field model of a liquid-to-solid transition was constructed where the model parameters were linked quantitatively to the interfacial properties, and the variation of nucleation barrier height in undercooled metallic melts with respect to undercooling was studied respectively based on two kinds of forms of local free energy density. The calculation results show that, with the increase of undercooling, the critical nucleus does not show bulk properties, and the nucleation barrier height decreases gradually and deviates more and more from that predicted by the classical nucleation theory in both cases. The physical spinodal occurs for a specific form of the local free energy density, where the nucleation barrier height vanishes when the undercooling reaches a critical value and the reduced nucleation barrier height can be expressed by a function of the ratio of undercooling to critical undercooling.

Cite this article

Gang WANG, Dechang ZENG, Zhongwu LIU . Nucleation barrier height in undercooled metallic melts[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2012 , 25(4) : 256 -264 . DOI: 10.11890/1006-7191-124-256

References

[1] D.W. Oxtoby,  J Phys: Condens Matter  4  (1992) 7627

[2] D.W. Oxtoby,  Acc Chem Res  31  (1998) 91

[3] D. Kashchiev and G.M. van Rosmalen,  Cryst Res Technol  38  (2003) 555

[4] D. Erdemir, A.Y. Lee and A.S. Myerson,  Acc Chem Res  42  (2009) 621

[5] J.W. Christian,  The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys (Part I)  (Pergamon, Oxford, 2002) p.422

[6] A. Laaksonen, V. Talanquer and D.W. Oxtoby,  Annu Rev Phys Chem  46  (1995) 489

[7] M.C. Weinberg,  J Non-Cryst Solids  255  (1999) 1

[8] S.E. Offerman, N.H. van Dijk, J. Sietsma, S. Grigull, E.M. Lauridsen, L. Margulies, H.F. Poulsen, M.T. Rekveldt, and S. van der Zwaag,  Science 298  (2002) 1003

[9] L. Granasy,  Mater Sci Forum  215-216  (1996) 451 [10]   H. Assadi and J. Schroers,  Acta Mater  50  (2002) 89

[11] D.H. Rasmussen,  J Cryst Growth  56  (1982) 45

[12] L. Granasy, T.Borzsonyi and T. Pusztai,  Phys Rev Lett  88  (2002) 206105

[13] G.I. Toth and L. Granasy,  J Phys Chem B  113  (2009) 5141

[14] G.I. Toth and L. Granasy,  J Chem Phys  127  (2007) 074709

[15] G.I. Toth and L. Granasy,  J Chem Phys  127  (2007) 074710

[16] G.I. Toth, J.R.Morris and L. Granasy,  Phys Rev Lett  106  (2011) 045701

[17] P.R. ten Wolde, M.J. Ruiz-Montero and D. Frenkel,  J Chem Phys  104  (1996) 9932

[18] S.G. Kim, W.T. Kim and T. Suzuki,  Phys Rev E  60  (1999) 7186

[19] C.Borchers,  Philos Mag A  79  (1999) 537

[20] C.K. Bagdassarian and D.W. Oxtoby,  J Chem Phys 100  (1994)2139

[21] S. Auer and D. Frenkel,  Nature  409 (2001) 1020

[22] Y. Zhang, C. Wang, D. Li and Y. Li,  Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett)  22  (2009) 197

[23]Y. Ding, X. Yuan, T. Guo and Y. Hu,  Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett)  23  (2010) 121
Outlines

/