Effect of CO2 partial pressure on SCC behavior of welded X80 pipeline in simulated soil solution

  • CHEN Xu ,
  • WU Meng ,
  • HE Chuan ,
  • XIAO Jun
Expand
  • College of Petroleum Engineering, liaoning Shihua University, Fushun 113001, China

Received date: 2010-06-30

  Revised date: 2010-10-15

  Online published: 2011-02-25

Abstract

The stress corrosion cracking (SCC) behavior of welded X80 pipeline steel in simulated Ku'erle soil solution was studied by means of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and slow strain rate tests (SSRT). The microstructure of the welded steel was observed by optical microscopy (OM). It is demonstrated that the microstructure of the weld metal consists of acicular ferrite and grain boundary ferrite, while that of heat affected zone (HAZ) is a mixture of acicular ferrite and bainitic ferrite microconstituents. The microstructure of the base steel is composed of ferrite and pearlite. The anodic dissolution of X80 pipeline steel in simulated Ku'erle soil solution could be enhanced and the SCC sensitivity increased with the increase of CO2 partial pressure. The SCC mechanism of X80 pipeline is a mixing mechanism of hydrogen embrittlement combined with anodic dissolution, and the hydrogen embrittlement plays a leading role. The higher SCC sensitivity of the weld metal was attributed to the metallurgical transformation, local hardening and residual stress.

Cite this article

CHEN Xu , WU Meng , HE Chuan , XIAO Jun . Effect of CO2 partial pressure on SCC behavior of welded X80 pipeline in simulated soil solution[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2011 , 24(1) : 65 -74 . DOI: 10.11890/1006-7191-111-65

References

[1] J. Li, M. Elboujdaini, M. Gao and R.W. Revie, Mater Sci Eng A  486(1)  (2008) 496.

[2] Z.Y. Liu, X.G. Li, Y.R. Zhang and C.W. Du,  Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett)  22(2)  (2009) 58.

[3] M.C. Li and Y.F. Cheng,  Electrochim Acta  52(28) (2007) 8111.

[4] P.G. Fazzini and J.L. Otegui,  Int J Pressure Vessels Piping  84(12)  (2007) 739.

[5] Z.Y. Liu, X.G. Li, C.W. Du and Y.F. Cheng,  Corros Sci  51(12)  (2009) 2863.

[6] E. Gamboa, V. Linton and M. Law,  Int J Fatigue 30(5)  (2008) 850.

[7] J.Q. Wang and A. Atrens,  Corros Sci  45(10) (2003) 2199.

[8] Z.Y. Liu, X.G. Li, C.W. Du, G.L. Zhai and Y.F. Cheng, Corros Sci  50(8)  (2008) 2251.

[9] R.N. Parkins and S. Zhou,  Corros Sci  39(1) (1997) 159.

[10] R.N. Parkins and S. Zhou,  Corros Sci  39(1) (1997) 175.

[11] B.A. Harle and J.A. Beavers,  Corrosion  49(10)(1993) 861.

[12] R.B. Rebak, Z. Xia and R. Safruddin,  Corrosion 52(5)  (1996) 396.

[13] L. Niu and Y.F. Cheng,  Appl Surf Sci  253(21) (2007) 8626.

[14] B. Gu, J.L. Luo and X. Mao,  Corrosion  55(1) (1999) 96.

[15] M. Puiggali, S. Rousserie and M. Touzet,  Corrosion 58(11)  (2002) 961.

[16] X. Liu and W. Yang,  Mater Mech Eng  26(1) (2002) 5 (in Chinese).

[17] G.A. Zhang and Y.F. Cheng,  Electrochim Acta  55(1) (2009) 316.

[18] G.A. Zhang and Y.F. Cheng,  Corros Sci  51(8) (2009) 1714.

[19] P. Liang, X.G. Li, C.W. Du and X. Chen,  Mater Des 30(5)  (2009) 1712.

[20] M.C. Yan, J.Q. Wang, E.H. Han and W. Ke,  Corros Eng Sci Technol  42(1)  (2007) 42.

[21] Y.F. Cheng,  Bull Electrochem  21(11)  (2005)503.

[22] E.A. Charles and R.N. Parkins,  Corrosion  51(7) (1995) 518.

[23] R. Wang,  J Chin Soc Corros Prot  28(2)  (2008)81 (in Chinese).

[24] L. Chen, M.Z. Liu, W.H. Su and C. Li,  Acta Metall Sin 17(5)  (1981) 541 (in Chinese).

[25] Y.M. Zeng, J.L. Luo and P.R. Norton,  Electrochim Acta  49(5)  (2004) 703.

[26] G. Van Boven, W. Chen and R. Rogge,  Acta Mater 55(1)  (2007) 29.

[27] Q. Yang, L.Q. Qiao and S. Chiovelli,  Corrosion 54(8)  (1998) 628.

[28] Y.F. Cheng,  J Mater Sci  42(8)  (2007) 2701.
Outlines

/