Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) ›› 2025, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 407-418.DOI: 10.1007/s40195-024-01804-y
Special Issue: 高熵合金专辑 2025年
Previous Articles Next Articles
Jingxiang Xu1(
), Yuyan Yang2, Ruiyang Huang1, Xinwei Yuan1(
), Huakang Bian2,3(
), Zhenhua Chu1, Yang Wang4, Yanhua Lei5
Received:2024-08-27
Revised:2024-10-30
Accepted:2024-11-07
Online:2025-03-10
Published:2025-01-04
Contact:
Jingxiang Xu, jxxu@shou.edu.cn;Xinwei Yuan, yuanxinwei1208@gmail.com;Huakang Bian, bianhuakang@shu.edu.cn
About author:Jingxiang Xu and Yuyan Yang have considered as co-first authors.
Jingxiang Xu, Yuyan Yang, Ruiyang Huang, Xinwei Yuan, Huakang Bian, Zhenhua Chu, Yang Wang, Yanhua Lei. Enhancing the Corrosion Resistance of FeNiCoCrW0.2Al0.1 High-Entropy Alloy in 3.5 wt% NaCl Solution by Bilayer Passivation[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(3): 407-418.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
| Fe | Co | Cr | Ni | W | Al |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.10 | 22.20 | 19.60 | 22.20 | 13.90 | 1.00 |
Table 1 Chemical composition of FeCoCrNiW0.2Al0.1 (wt%)
| Fe | Co | Cr | Ni | W | Al |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.10 | 22.20 | 19.60 | 22.20 | 13.90 | 1.00 |
| K-points | Cutoff energy (eV) | Force convergence (eV/Å) | Magnetic mom (μ) | U | J | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoO (111) | 4 × 4 × 1 | 480 | 0.01 | 1.90 (Ref. [ | 3.70 (Ref. [ | 0 (Ref. [ |
| (3 × 3) | ||||||
| NiO (111) | 4 × 4 × 1 | 480 | 0.01 | 2.90 (Ref. [ | 6.30 (Ref. [ | 0 (Ref. [ |
| (3 × 3) | ||||||
| α-Fe2O3 (0001) | 3 × 3 × 1 | 480 | 0.01 | 4.90 (Ref. [ | 4.00 (Ref. [ | 0 (Ref. [ |
| (2 × 2) | ||||||
| α-Cr2O3 (0001) | 3 × 3 × 1 | 480 | 0.01 | 3.05 (Ref. [ | 5.00 (Ref. [ | 1.00 (Ref. [ |
| (2 × 2) |
Table 2 Parameter settings for DFT calculations for different metal oxides
| K-points | Cutoff energy (eV) | Force convergence (eV/Å) | Magnetic mom (μ) | U | J | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoO (111) | 4 × 4 × 1 | 480 | 0.01 | 1.90 (Ref. [ | 3.70 (Ref. [ | 0 (Ref. [ |
| (3 × 3) | ||||||
| NiO (111) | 4 × 4 × 1 | 480 | 0.01 | 2.90 (Ref. [ | 6.30 (Ref. [ | 0 (Ref. [ |
| (3 × 3) | ||||||
| α-Fe2O3 (0001) | 3 × 3 × 1 | 480 | 0.01 | 4.90 (Ref. [ | 4.00 (Ref. [ | 0 (Ref. [ |
| (2 × 2) | ||||||
| α-Cr2O3 (0001) | 3 × 3 × 1 | 480 | 0.01 | 3.05 (Ref. [ | 5.00 (Ref. [ | 1.00 (Ref. [ |
| (2 × 2) |
| Alloy composition | Ecorr (mV) | icorr (A/cm2) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeCoNiCr0.5 | − 319 | 2.36 × 10-6 | [ |
| CoCrFeNiGe0.3 | − 34 | 5.60 × 10-5 | [ |
| Al2CrFeCoCuTiNi | − 220 | 1.30 × 10-4 | [ |
| Al2CrFeCoCuTiNi2 | − 500 | 6.70 × 10-4 | [ |
| Al0.9CoCrFeNiTi0.5 | − 347 | 3.10 × 10-8 | [ |
| CoCrFeNi2Mo0.25 | − 260 | 1.25 × 10-7 | [ |
| CoCrFeNiMo0.4 | − 261 | 8.20 × 10-8 | [ |
| Al0.3CoCrFeNi | − 195 | 8.40 × 10-8 | [ |
| (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 | − 128 | 7.23 × 10-6 | [ |
| Co2CrCuFeMnNi | − 787 | 6.95 × 10-6 | [ |
| FeCoCrNiW0.2Al0.1 | − 163 ± 14 | (2.24 ± 0.09) × 10-7 | Present work |
Table 3 Comparison of data obtained from polarization tests of various HEAs in 3.5 wt% NaCl
| Alloy composition | Ecorr (mV) | icorr (A/cm2) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeCoNiCr0.5 | − 319 | 2.36 × 10-6 | [ |
| CoCrFeNiGe0.3 | − 34 | 5.60 × 10-5 | [ |
| Al2CrFeCoCuTiNi | − 220 | 1.30 × 10-4 | [ |
| Al2CrFeCoCuTiNi2 | − 500 | 6.70 × 10-4 | [ |
| Al0.9CoCrFeNiTi0.5 | − 347 | 3.10 × 10-8 | [ |
| CoCrFeNi2Mo0.25 | − 260 | 1.25 × 10-7 | [ |
| CoCrFeNiMo0.4 | − 261 | 8.20 × 10-8 | [ |
| Al0.3CoCrFeNi | − 195 | 8.40 × 10-8 | [ |
| (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 | − 128 | 7.23 × 10-6 | [ |
| Co2CrCuFeMnNi | − 787 | 6.95 × 10-6 | [ |
| FeCoCrNiW0.2Al0.1 | − 163 ± 14 | (2.24 ± 0.09) × 10-7 | Present work |
Fig. 4 EIS test data and fitting results: a Nyquist plots of test specimens and b bode plots of test specimens. Hollow dots represent the test data, while solid dots depict the fitting results
| Rs (Ω cm2) | Rct (Ω cm2) | Rpas (Ω cm2) | Rpas1 (Ω cm2) | Rpas2 (Ω cm2) | CPEdl (S sn cm−2) | ndl | CPEpas (S sn cm−2) | npas | CPEpas1 (S sn cm−2) | npas1 | CPEpas2 (S sn cm−2) | npas2 | dpas (nm) | dpas1 (nm) | dpas2 (nm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10.45 | 1.81 × 104 | 1.18 × 104 | - | - | 1.01 × 10-4 | 0.91 | 3.73 × 10-5 | 0.94 | - | - | 7.12 | - | - | ||
| 9 d | 7.47 | - | - | 630 | 2430 | - | - | 5.05 × 10-5 | 0.84 | 2.56 × 10-4 | 0.73 | - | 5.26 | 1.04 | ||
| 24 d | 7.27 | - | - | 1702 | 1310 | - | - | 6.25 × 10-5 | 0.8 | 8.07 × 10-5 | 0.8 | - | 4.25 | 3.29 |
Table 4 Parameter values of circuit elements and estimated passivation film thickness
| Rs (Ω cm2) | Rct (Ω cm2) | Rpas (Ω cm2) | Rpas1 (Ω cm2) | Rpas2 (Ω cm2) | CPEdl (S sn cm−2) | ndl | CPEpas (S sn cm−2) | npas | CPEpas1 (S sn cm−2) | npas1 | CPEpas2 (S sn cm−2) | npas2 | dpas (nm) | dpas1 (nm) | dpas2 (nm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10.45 | 1.81 × 104 | 1.18 × 104 | - | - | 1.01 × 10-4 | 0.91 | 3.73 × 10-5 | 0.94 | - | - | 7.12 | - | - | ||
| 9 d | 7.47 | - | - | 630 | 2430 | - | - | 5.05 × 10-5 | 0.84 | 2.56 × 10-4 | 0.73 | - | 5.26 | 1.04 | ||
| 24 d | 7.27 | - | - | 1702 | 1310 | - | - | 6.25 × 10-5 | 0.8 | 8.07 × 10-5 | 0.8 | - | 4.25 | 3.29 |
| Oxidation state | Orbital | Energy peak (original surface 0 nm) | Energy peak (original surface -5 nm) | Energy peak (corroded surface 0 nm) | Energy peak (corroded surface -5 nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe (Fe3+) | 2p3/2 | 710.71 | 710.64 | 710.80 | 710.27 |
| Fe (metal) | 2p3/2 | 706.81 | 707.19 | 706.56 | 707.09 |
| Cr (Cr (OH)3) | 2p3/2 | 576.99 | 577.02 | 576.70 | 576.54 |
| Cr (Cr2O3) | 2p3/2 | 575.70 | 575.75 | 576.00 | 575.61 |
| Cr (metal) | 2p3/2 | 573.51 | 574.14 | 573.12 | 574.22 |
| Ni (Ni2+) | 2p3/2 | 855.53 | 854.83 | 854.79 | 854.82 |
| Ni (metal) | 2p3/2 | 852.33 | 852.87 | 851.83 | 852.72 |
| Co (Co2+) | 2p3/2 | 780.76 | 779.28 | 780.13 | 781.19 |
| Co (metal) | 2p3/2 | 777.77 | 778.05 | 777.46 | 778.08 |
| W (W6+) | 4f7/2 | 35.17 | 35.81 | 35.03 | 35.70 |
| W (metal) | 4f7/2 | 30.88 | 31.40 | 30.71 | 31.18 |
| Al (Al3+) | 2p3/2 | 73.16 | 73.36 | 73.37 | 73.80 |
| O (H2O) | 1s | 532.20 | - | 532.30 | - |
| O (O2−) | 1s | 529.64 | 530.41 | 529.54 | 530.31 |
| O (OH−) | 1s | 531.28 | 531.58 | 531.32 | 531.59 |
Table 5 Positions of energy peaks and possible oxidation states of the six elements obtained after fitting the XPS core energy level spectra
| Oxidation state | Orbital | Energy peak (original surface 0 nm) | Energy peak (original surface -5 nm) | Energy peak (corroded surface 0 nm) | Energy peak (corroded surface -5 nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe (Fe3+) | 2p3/2 | 710.71 | 710.64 | 710.80 | 710.27 |
| Fe (metal) | 2p3/2 | 706.81 | 707.19 | 706.56 | 707.09 |
| Cr (Cr (OH)3) | 2p3/2 | 576.99 | 577.02 | 576.70 | 576.54 |
| Cr (Cr2O3) | 2p3/2 | 575.70 | 575.75 | 576.00 | 575.61 |
| Cr (metal) | 2p3/2 | 573.51 | 574.14 | 573.12 | 574.22 |
| Ni (Ni2+) | 2p3/2 | 855.53 | 854.83 | 854.79 | 854.82 |
| Ni (metal) | 2p3/2 | 852.33 | 852.87 | 851.83 | 852.72 |
| Co (Co2+) | 2p3/2 | 780.76 | 779.28 | 780.13 | 781.19 |
| Co (metal) | 2p3/2 | 777.77 | 778.05 | 777.46 | 778.08 |
| W (W6+) | 4f7/2 | 35.17 | 35.81 | 35.03 | 35.70 |
| W (metal) | 4f7/2 | 30.88 | 31.40 | 30.71 | 31.18 |
| Al (Al3+) | 2p3/2 | 73.16 | 73.36 | 73.37 | 73.80 |
| O (H2O) | 1s | 532.20 | - | 532.30 | - |
| O (O2−) | 1s | 529.64 | 530.41 | 529.54 | 530.31 |
| O (OH−) | 1s | 531.28 | 531.58 | 531.32 | 531.59 |
| Cl coverage (ML) | Substitution energy (eV) | Vacancy formation energy (eV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiO | CoO | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | NiO | CoO | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | |
| 1/12 | - | - | − 0.03 | − 0.18 | - | - | 3.70 | − 0.85 |
| 1/9 | − 0.55 | − 1.05 | - | - | 4.41 | 3.70 | - | - |
| 3/9(4/12) | − 0.43 | − 0.51 | − 0.01 | − 0.18 | 4.19 | 4.04 | 3.17 | − 1.66 |
| 5/9 | 0.04 | − 0.17 | - | - | 3.13 | 1.42 | - | - |
| 8/12 | - | - | 0.30 | 0.31 | - | - | 0.01 | − 2.55 |
| 7/9 | 0.13 | − 0.02 | - | - | 2.74 | 0.89 | - | - |
| 9/9(12/12) | 0.30 | 0.86 | 0.54 | 0.35 | 0.76 | − 7.34 | − 2.81 | − 4.37 |
Table 6 Corresponding substitution and adsorption energies of the four metal oxide surfaces at different coverage levels
| Cl coverage (ML) | Substitution energy (eV) | Vacancy formation energy (eV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiO | CoO | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | NiO | CoO | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | |
| 1/12 | - | - | − 0.03 | − 0.18 | - | - | 3.70 | − 0.85 |
| 1/9 | − 0.55 | − 1.05 | - | - | 4.41 | 3.70 | - | - |
| 3/9(4/12) | − 0.43 | − 0.51 | − 0.01 | − 0.18 | 4.19 | 4.04 | 3.17 | − 1.66 |
| 5/9 | 0.04 | − 0.17 | - | - | 3.13 | 1.42 | - | - |
| 8/12 | - | - | 0.30 | 0.31 | - | - | 0.01 | − 2.55 |
| 7/9 | 0.13 | − 0.02 | - | - | 2.74 | 0.89 | - | - |
| 9/9(12/12) | 0.30 | 0.86 | 0.54 | 0.35 | 0.76 | − 7.34 | − 2.81 | − 4.37 |
Fig. 8 Changes in substitution energy and vacancy formation energy with respect to Cl− coverage: a substitution energy plotted against Cl− coverage and b vacancy formation energy plotted against Cl− coverage
| [1] | X.M. Zhang, Z.Y. Chen, H.F. Luo, T. Zhou, Y.L. Zhao, Z.C. Ling, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 32, 377 (2022) |
| [2] | Y. Wang, J.A. Wharton, R.A. Shenoi, Corros. Sci. 86, 42 (2014) |
| [3] | B.G. Koushik, N. Van den Steen, M.H. Mamme, Y. Van Ingelgem, H. Terryn, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 62, 254 (2021) |
| [4] | M.H. Tsai, J.W. Yeh, Mater. Res. Lett. 2, 107 (2014) |
| [5] |
Y. Ikeda, B. Grabowski, F. Kormann, Mater. Charact. 147, 464 (2019)
DOI |
| [6] | W.K. Chai, T. Lu, Y. Pan, Intermetallics 116, 106654 (2020) |
| [7] | H.C. Liu, C.W. Tsai, Intermetallics 132, 107167 (2021) |
| [8] | X.W. Qiu, C.G. Liu, J. Alloys Compd. 553, 216 (2013) |
| [9] | Y. Qiu, S. Thomas, D. Fabijanic, A.J. Barlow, H.L. Fraser, N. Birbilis, Mater. Des. 170, 107698 (2019) |
| [10] | A.A. Rodriguez, J.H. Tylczak, M.C. Gao, P.D. Jablonski, M. Detrois, M. Ziomek-Moroz, J.A. Hawk, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 3016304 (2018) |
| [11] | X.L. Shang, Z.J. Wang, Q.F. Wu, J.C. Wang, J.J. Li, J.K. Yu, Acta Metall. Sin. -Engl. Lett. 32, 41 (2019) |
| [12] | Y.Z. Shi, B. Yang, X. Xie, J. Brechtl, K.A. Dahmen, P.K. Liaw, Corros. Sci. 119, 33 (2017) |
| [13] | W.R. Wang, W. Qi, L. Xie, X. Yang, J.T. Li, Y. Zhang, Materials 12, 694 (2019) |
| [14] | R.F. Zhao, B. Ren, B. Cai, Z.X. Liu, G.P. Zhang, J.J. Zhang, Results Phys. 15, 102667 (2019) |
| [15] | B.T. Tran, H.A. Pham, V.T. Nguyen, D.P. Doan, T.T.T. Hoang, N.X. Ho, D.V. Nguyen, T. Le Manh, J. Alloy. Compd. 973, 172860 (2024) |
| [16] | Z. Wang, Z.X. Liu, J. Jin, D.Z. Tang, L. Zhang, Corros. Sci. 218, 111206 (2023) |
| [17] | A. Tanji, R. Feng, Z. Lyu, R. Sakidja, P.K. Liaw, H. Hermawan, Corros. Sci. 210, 110828 (2023) |
| [18] | H. Feng, H.B. Li, J. Dai, Y. Han, J.D. Qu, Z.H. Jiang, Y. Zhao, T. Zhang, Corros. Sci. 204, 110396 (2022) |
| [19] | H. Feng, J. Dai, H.B. Li, X.Z. Cao, H.C. Zhu, S.C. Zhang, T. He, Z.H. Jiang, T. Zhang, Corros. Sci. 235, 112162 (2024) |
| [20] | A. Veluchamy, D. Sherwood, B. Emmanuel, I.S. Cole, J. Electroanal. Chem. 785, 196 (2017) |
| [21] | W.R. Wang, W.L. Wang, S.C. Wang, Y.C. Tsai, C.H. Lai, J.W. Yeh, Intermetallics 26, 44 (2012) |
| [22] | M. Abdullah, M. Mukarram, T.B. Yaqub, F. Fernandes, K. Yaqoob, Int. J. Refract. Met. H. 115, 106300 (2023) |
| [23] | A. Bouzoubaa, D. Costa, B. Diawara, N. Audiffren, P. Marcus, Corros. Sci. 52, 2643 (2010) |
| [24] | A. Bouzoubaa, B. Diawara, V. Maurice, C. Minot, P. Marcus, Corros. Sci. 51, 941 (2009) |
| [25] | M. Liu, Y. Jin, C. Leygraf, J. Pan, J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, 3124 (2019) |
| [26] | K. Oware Sarfo, P. Murkute, O.B. Isgor, Y. Zhang, J. Tucker, L. Árnadóttir, J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 121508 (2020) |
| [27] |
Q. Pang, H. DorMohammadi, O.B. Isgor, L. Árnadóttir, Corros. Sci. 154, 61 (2019)
DOI |
| [28] | X. Yin, H. Wang, E.-H. Han, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 129, 70 (2022) |
| [29] | G. Kresse, J. Non-Cryst, Solids 193, 222 (1995) |
| [30] |
G. Kresse, J. Furthmuller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)
DOI PMID |
| [31] | G. Kresse, J. Furthmuller, Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996) |
| [32] |
J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)
DOI PMID |
| [33] | V.I. Anisimov, F. Aryasetiawan, A.I. Lichtenstein, J. Phys. Condens. Mater. 9, 767 (1997) |
| [34] | S.L. Dudarev, G.A. Botton, S.Y. Savrasov, C.J. Humphreys, A.P. Sutton, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998) |
| [35] | A.I. Liechtenstein, V.I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, Phys. Rev. B 52, 5476 (1995) |
| [36] | B.S. Youmbi, F. Calvayrac, Surf. Sci. 621, 1 (2014) |
| [37] | D.D. Macdonald, Electrochim. Acta 56, 1761 (2011) |
| [38] | J. Soltis, Passivity breakdown. Corros. Sci. 90, 5 (2015) |
| [39] | P. Varshney, R.S. Mishra, N. Kumar, J. Alloys Compd. 904, 164100 (2022) |
| [1] | Lei Chen, Gang Qin, Yao Chen, Qi Wang, Liang Wang, Yanqing Su, Ruirun Chen. Machine learning-assisted design of lightweight refractory high-entropy alloys: A comprehensive review [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 40(2): 26-47. |
| [2] | Xuhui Liu, Zijin Xiao, Yang Yuan, Qihong Huang, Kaiwei Tang, Yilong Dai, Dechuang Zhang, Jia She, Feng Peng, Fugang Qi, Xiaoping Ouyang. Corrosion-resistant and bioactive FeMn-CaP-Col@CS coating on magnesium alloy for orthopedic implants: Fabrication and characterization [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 1-12. |
| [3] | Shuai Hao, Xiang-Mei Wen, Jun Cheng, Xue-Yan Yao, Wei-Ying Huang, Rui-Feng Li, Liang-Yu Chen. Tailoring corrosion resistance of laser powder bed fusion produced Ti-6Al-4V via heat treatment at 700 °C in potential biomedical applications: Microstructural evolution and electrochemical behavior [J]. Metals Advances, 2026, 39(1): 83-94. |
| [4] | Hao Cheng, Cheng-Lei Wang, Xiao-Du Li, Li Pan, Chao-Jie Liang, Wei-Jie Liu. Machine Learning-Based High Entropy Alloys-Algorithms and Workflow: A Review [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1453-1480. |
| [5] | Zhenzhen Tian, Rongqian Wu, Fubing Yu, Yan Zhou, Wenhui Yao, Yuan Yuan, Zhihui Xie, Yanlong Ma, Atrens Andrej, Liang Wu. Preparation and Corrosion Resistance Mechanism of Magnesium-Lithium Alloy Micro-arc Oxidation/Quaternary LDHs@GO Self-healing Composite Film [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(9): 1545-1558. |
| [6] | Yi-Fan Zhang, Liang-Yu Chen, Zi-Han Ge, Chenglong Teng, Yong Liu, Lai-Chang Zhang. In Vitro Gradual Decrease in Strength of Ti Scaffolds in Hank’s Solution upon Long-Term Immersion: Challenges and Prospective Solutions [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1331-1339. |
| [7] | Zheng-Hong Liu, Ying Han, Jia-Peng Sun, Ming-Kun Jiang, Ying Song, Guo-Qing Zu, Xu Ran. A Novel Cu-Modified 20Cr Lean Duplex Stainless Steel with Exceptional Combination of Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1361-1370. |
| [8] | Yuntian Lou, Shengyu He, Xudong Chen, Weiwei Chang, Hao Zhang, Jingzhi Yang, Hongchang Qian, Dawei Zhang. Effect of Ultrasonic Shot Peening on the Corrosion Resistance and Antibacterial Properties of 304 Cu-Bearing Stainless Steel [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1371-1384. |
| [9] | Huimin Yang, Kun Yang, Guobing Wei, Rongguang Li. Optimization of Surface Layer Properties of Mg-9Li-1Zn Alloy by Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Process and its Impact on Corrosion Behavior [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(8): 1421-1435. |
| [10] | Dongchao Li, Fen Zhang, Lanyue Cui, Yueling Guo, Rongchang Zeng. Accelerated Corrosion Rate of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy: The Formation of Nano-scaled AlMn Phase [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(7): 1069-1082. |
| [11] | Hanqiang Liu, Xing Li, Jibo Su, Chaoyun Yang, Yikun Luan, Dianzhong Li. Pitting Corrosion Behaviour in 9Cr18 Bearing Steel Under Salt Spray Environment [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(7): 1237-1245. |
| [12] | Li Zhao, Tian-Yu Cui, Wei-Wei Chang, Hong-Chang Qian, Yun-Tian Lou, Jing-Zhi Yang, Da-Wei Zhang. Effect of Mineralization Induced by Shewanella algae on Passive Film of Stainless Steel via FIB-SEM/TEM and EELS [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(6): 877-888. |
| [13] | Yunhu Ding, Yingpeng Li, Hongfang Liu, Wenhao Wang, Yijun Wei, Haitao Duan, Wen Zhan. Corrosion Evolution Behavior of Ti/Zr/Oligomeric Epoxy Silane Composite Chemical Conversion Coatings on Multi-metals [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(6): 889-903. |
| [14] | Yang Zhao, Bo He, Jinliang Yang, Yongxiang Liu, Tao Zhang, Fuhui Wang. Critical Role of Intermetallic Particles in the Corrosion of 6061 Aluminum Alloy and Anodized Aluminum Used in Semiconductor Processing Equipment [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(6): 904-924. |
| [15] | Chenzhi Xing, Ming-Hsien Lee, Gongwang Cao, Yuwei Liu, Quanzhong Guo, Zhenyao Wang, Chuan Wang. Discoloration Process of Minted Copper-Nickel Alloys in Chloride Ion-Containing Environments: Experimental and DFT Research [J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2025, 38(6): 925-945. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
WeChat
